Literature DB >> 16181009

Variation in pediatric aerosol delivery: importance of facemask.

Gerald C Smaldone1, Elna Berg, Kurt Nikander.   

Abstract

We have quantified in vitro the influence of the facemask on the amount of drug delivered (e.g., inhaled mass) by jet nebulizer and pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) valved holding chamber (VHC) combinations (non-detergent-coated and detergent-coated). Pediatric breathing patterns were used with a breathing simulator, which was connected to a face onto which each device was positioned. An inhaled mass filter interposed between the simulator and the face captured the aerosolized drug. Budesonide inhalation suspension (0.25 mg) was used with the jet nebulizers and fluticasone propionate (220 microg) pMDI with the VHCs. Maximal drug delivery was measured using constant flow through each device. Breathing pattern effects were assessed for sealed devices (no leaks) and with facemasks (possible leaks at the facemask). Inhaled mass from both nebulizers and pMDI VHCs was affected by breathing pattern, but compared to nebulizers the pMDI VHCs were significantly more variable and sensitive to several factors. The influence of VHC conditioning combined with effects of breathing pattern resulted in the inhaled mass ranging from 0.7 +/- 0.5 to 53.3 +/- 6.2%. Nebulizers were less variable (9.6 +/- 0.7 to 24.3 +/- 3.1%). Detergent coating of VHC markedly increased the inhaled mass and reproducibility of drug delivery (27.2 +/- 1.4 to 53.3 +/- 6.2%) for pMDI VHC combinations, but these effects were lost in the presence of facemasks. Using pediatric patterns of breathing, nebulizer/facemask combinations delivered 4.1 +/- 0.8 to 19.3 +/- 2.3% of the label dose while pMDI and detergent-coated VHC delivered 4.0 +/- 1.6 to 28.6 +/- 2.5%. Facemask seal is a key factor in drug delivery. Leaks around the facemask reduce drug delivery and for pMDI VHCs can negate effects of detergent coating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16181009     DOI: 10.1089/jam.2005.18.354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Med        ISSN: 0894-2684


  12 in total

Review 1.  A path to successful patient outcomes through aerosol drug delivery to children: a narrative review.

Authors:  Arzu Ari
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

2.  Wheeze in childhood: is the spacer good enough?

Authors:  Veena Rajkumar; Barathi Rajendra; Choon How How; Seng Bin Ang
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 3.  Devices for Improved Delivery of Nebulized Pharmaceutical Aerosols to the Lungs.

Authors:  Worth Longest; Benjamin Spence; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.849

4.  Aerosol Drug Delivery During Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation: Effects of Intersubject Variability and Excipient Enhanced Growth.

Authors:  Ross L Walenga; P Worth Longest; Anubhav Kaviratna; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.849

5.  Development of an Inline Dry Powder Inhaler for Oral or Trans-Nasal Aerosol Administration to Children.

Authors:  Dale Farkas; Michael Hindle; Serena Bonasera; Karl Bass; Worth Longest
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.849

Review 6.  Drug delivery interfaces: A way to optimize inhalation therapy in spontaneously breathing children.

Authors:  Arzu Ari
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-08

7.  Developing ways to evaluate in the laboratory how inhalation devices will be used by patients and care-givers: the need for clinically appropriate testing.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell; Jason A Suggett
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 8.  Inhaled chemotherapy in lung cancer: future concept of nanomedicine.

Authors:  Paul Zarogoulidis; Ekaterini Chatzaki; Konstantinos Porpodis; Kalliopi Domvri; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Eugene P Goldberg; Nikos Karamanos; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-03-22

9.  Assessing Modeled CO(2) Retention and Rebreathing of a Facemask Designed for Efficient Delivery of Aerosols to Infants.

Authors:  Christian Mundt; Alexander Sventitskiy; Jeffrey E Cehelsky; Andrea B Patters; Markus Tservistas; Michael C Hahn; Gerd Juhl; John P Devincenzo
Journal:  ISRN Pediatr       Date:  2012-06-26

Review 10.  A review of the in vitro and in vivo valved holding chamber (VHC) literature with a focus on the AeroChamber Plus Flow-Vu Anti-static VHC.

Authors:  Sanjeeva Dissanayake; Jason Suggett
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.