Literature DB >> 16179219

Prenatal diagnosis by array-CGH.

L Rickman1, H Fiegler, N P Carter, M Bobrow.   

Abstract

Microscopic karyotype analysis of cultured cells has been regarded as the gold standard for prenatal diagnosis for over 30 years. Since the first application of this technique to prenatal testing in the early 1970's, this procedure has proved to be highly reliable for identifying chromosome copy number abnormalities (aneuploidy) and large structural rearrangements in foetal cells obtained invasively by either amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Recognising the need for more rapid testing methods which do not require cell culture, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) have been introduced to this field in order to answer specific diagnostic questions. However, both FISH and QF-PCR suffer the disadvantage in that they are difficult to scale to a comprehensive, genome-wide screen. Array-comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH) in contrast is a comprehensive, genome-wide screening strategy for detecting DNA copy number imbalances which can be rapid, less labour-intensive than karyotype banding analysis and is highly amenable to automation. Array-CGH has the potential to be used for prenatal diagnosis and may address many of the limitations of both conventional microscopic cytogenetic analyses and the more recently employed rapid-screening strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16179219     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2005.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Genet        ISSN: 1769-7212            Impact factor:   2.708


  13 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnosis of genomic disorders and chromosome abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Francesca Gullotta; Michela Biancolella; Elena Costa; Isabella Colapietro; Anna Maria Nardone; Paolo Molinaro; Adalgisa Pietropolli; Marianovella Narcisi; Cristiana Di Rosa; Giuseppe Novelli
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2007-01

2.  Now you can! Reality & Future Applications of array CGH in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Diana Postorivo; Anna Maria Nardone; Michela Biancolella; Alvaro Mesoraca; Giuseppe Novelli
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2009-04

3.  Assessment of QF-PCR as the first approach in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Celia Badenas; Laia Rodríguez-Revenga; Carme Morales; Carmen Mediano; Alberto Plaja; Ma Mar Pérez-Iribarne; Anna Soler; Núria Clusellas; Antoni Borrell; Ma Ángeles Sánchez; Elisabeth Miró; Aurora Sánchez; Montserrat Milà; Wladimiro Jiménez
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Application of SNP array for rapid prenatal diagnosis: implementation, genetic counselling and diagnostic flow.

Authors:  Malgorzata Srebniak; Marjan Boter; Grétel Oudesluijs; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde Govaerts; Diane Van Opstal; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Genetic effects of a 13q31.1 microdeletion detected by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

Authors:  Yifang Jia; Heyong Zhao; Donghong Shi; Wen Peng; Luwen Xie; Wei Wang; Fuman Jiang; Hongyun Zhang; Xietong Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

6.  Genome-wide array-based copy number profiling in human placentas from unexplained stillbirths.

Authors:  R Alan Harris; Francesca Ferrari; Shay Ben-Shachar; Xiaoling Wang; George Saade; Ignatia Van Den Veyver; Fabio Facchinetti; Kjersti Aagaard-Tillery
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs.

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Karin Em Diderich; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde Cp Govaerts; Jeroen Knijnenburg; Femke At de Vries; Marjan Boter; Debora Lont; Maarten Fcm Knapen; Merel C de Wit; Attie Tji Go; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations.

Authors:  Paola Evangelidou; Carolina Sismani; Marios Ioannides; Christodoulos Christodoulou; George Koumbaris; Ioannis Kallikas; Ioannis Georgiou; Voula Velissariou; Philippos C Patsalis
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Clinical implementation of chromosomal microarray analysis: summary of 2513 postnatal cases.

Authors:  Xinyan Lu; Chad A Shaw; Ankita Patel; Jiangzhen Li; M Lance Cooper; William R Wells; Cathy M Sullivan; Trilochan Sahoo; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Carlos A Bacino; Pawel Stankiewicz; Zhishu Ou; A Craig Chinault; Arthur L Beaudet; James R Lupski; Sau W Cheung; Patricia A Ward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  De novo complex intra chromosomal rearrangement after ICSI: characterisation by BACs micro array-CGH.

Authors:  Serdar Kasakyan; Laurence Lohmann; Azeddine Aboura; Mazin Quimsiyeh; Yves Menezo; Gerard Tachdjian; Moncef Benkhalifa
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.