Literature DB >> 16177701

An evaluation model for syndromic surveillance: assessing the performance of a temporal algorithm.

David L Buckeridge1, P Switzer, D Owens, D Siegrist, J Pavlin, M Musen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Syndromic surveillance offers the potential to rapidly detect outbreaks resulting from terrorism. Despite considerable experience with implementing syndromic surveillance, limited evidence exists to describe the performance of syndromic surveillance systems in detecting outbreaks.
OBJECTIVES: To describe a model for simulating cases that might result from exposure to inhalational anthrax and then use the model to evaluate the ability of syndromic surveillance to detect an outbreak of inhalational anthrax after an aerosol release.
METHODS: Disease progression and health-care use were simulated for persons infected with anthrax. Simulated cases were then superimposed on authentic surveillance data to create test data sets. A temporal outbreak detection algorithm was applied to each test data set, and sensitivity and timeliness of outbreak detection were calculated by using syndromic surveillance.
RESULTS: The earliest detection using a temporal algorithm was 2 days after a release. Earlier detection tended to occur when more persons were infected, and performance worsened as the proportion of persons seeking care in the prodromal disease state declined. A shorter median incubation state led to earlier detection, as soon as 1 day after release when the incubation state was < or =5 days.
CONCLUSION: Syndromic surveillance of a respiratory syndrome using a temporal detection algorithm tended to detect an anthrax attack within 3-4 days after exposure if >10,000 persons were infected. The performance of surveillance (i.e., timeliness and sensitivity) worsened as the number of persons infected decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16177701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Suppl        ISSN: 2380-8942


  15 in total

1.  Finding leading indicators for disease outbreaks: filtering, cross-correlation, and caveats.

Authors:  Ronald M Bloom; David L Buckeridge; Karen E Cheng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Comparison of two signal detection methods in a coroner-based system for near real-time mortality surveillance.

Authors:  Matthew R Groenewold
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Bayesian information fusion networks for biosurveillance applications.

Authors:  Zaruhi R Mnatsakanyan; Howard S Burkom; Jacqueline S Coberly; Joseph S Lombardo
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Syndromic surveillance using veterinary laboratory data: data pre-processing and algorithm performance evaluation.

Authors:  Fernanda C Dórea; Beverly J McEwen; W Bruce McNab; Crawford W Revie; Javier Sanchez
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Influenza detection and prediction algorithms: comparative accuracy trial in Östergötland county, Sweden, 2008-2012.

Authors:  A Spreco; O Eriksson; Ö Dahlström; T Timpka
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Evaluating detection of an inhalational anthrax outbreak.

Authors:  David L Buckeridge; Douglas K Owens; Paul Switzer; John Frank; Mark A Musen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Using GIS to create synthetic disease outbreaks.

Authors:  Rochelle E Watkins; Serryn Eagleson; Sam Beckett; Graeme Garner; Bert Veenendaal; Graeme Wright; Aileen J Plant
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Approaches to the evaluation of outbreak detection methods.

Authors:  Rochelle E Watkins; Serryn Eagleson; Robert G Hall; Lynne Dailey; Aileen J Plant
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A simulation study comparing aberration detection algorithms for syndromic surveillance.

Authors:  Michael L Jackson; Atar Baer; Ian Painter; Jeff Duchin
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  in silico surveillance: evaluating outbreak detection with simulation models.

Authors:  Bryan Lewis; Stephen Eubank; Allyson M Abrams; Ken Kleinman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.