Literature DB >> 16177018

The potential for mathematical modelling in the assessment of the radiation dose equivalent of cytotoxic chemotherapy given concomitantly with radiotherapy.

B Jones1, R G Dale.   

Abstract

The linear quadratic (LQ) concept of biological effective dose (BED) is used with Poisson statistics to estimate the radiation equivalent BED of cytotoxic chemotherapy (CBED) that would provide improvements in tumour control probability (TCP) typically achieved in randomized clinical trials of chemoradiation. The concepts of pure radio-sensitization and independent chemotherapy cell kill are represented by mathematical equations. Small values of sensitizer enhancement ratios (s) can provide modest increases in TCP when large numbers of radiotherapy fractions are sensitized; larger s values are required if only a small number of radiotherapy fractions are sensitized. Independent chemotherapy induced cell kill is sufficient to explain the benefits achieved with concomitant chemoradiotherapy in situations where a sufficiently high chemotherapy dose intensity is used (i.e. the dose-time intensity of cytotoxic chemotherapy without radiation is considered to be sufficient to cause significant tumour regression although not cure). Care is required in the use of the Poisson cure probability model because of the associated steep dose-response curves that may underestimate both s and the CBED. By use of random sampling methods and estimation over a theoretical population of different tumours, more robust results are obtained with dose-response curves that correspond better to those in clinical data sets. These predict a 2-4 Gy(10) equivalent for each pulse of chemotherapy such as single agent Cis-Platinum when used weekly during radiotherapy for a maximum of 4 cycles. This preliminary paper does not consider normal tissue complication probabilities, of which there are relatively few mature results for modern chemoradiotherapy. The BED concept can be used to estimate the equivalent dose of radiotherapy that will achieve the same cell kill as concomitant cytotoxic chemotherapy. Relatively simple radiobiological modelling can be used to guide decision-making regarding the assessment of the most appropriate combined modality schedules, and has important implications in the design of clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16177018     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/40226390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  10 in total

Review 1.  21 years of biologically effective dose.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Models of acute mucosal tolerance to radiotherapy alone applied to synchronous chemoradiation schedules in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Sara Meade; Paul Sanghera; John Glaholm; Andrew Hartley
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-10-09

3.  Can radiobiological parameters derived from squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck be used to predict local control in anal cancer treated with chemoradiation?

Authors:  L Pettit; S Meade; P Sanghera; J Glaholm; J I Geh; A Hartley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Can drugs enhance hypofractionated radiotherapy? A novel method of modeling radiosensitization using in vitro data.

Authors:  Nitin Ohri; Adam P Dicker; Yaacov Richard Lawrence
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  The physical basis and future of radiation therapy.

Authors:  T Bortfeld; R Jeraj
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Radiation Duration in Women with Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Chemoradiation: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Ana I Tergas; Alfred I Neugut; Ling Chen; William M Burke; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  Single-Arm Phase 2 Trial of Elective Nodal Dose Reduction for Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Authors:  Patrick D Maguire; Charles R Neal; Stuart M Hardy; Andrew M Schreiber
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Concurrent weekly cisplatin versus triweekly cisplatin with radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the cervix: a retrospective analysis from a single institution.

Authors:  Yoshino Kinjyo; Yutaka Nagai; Takafumi Toita; Wataru Kudaka; Takuro Ariga; Yuko Shimoji; Tadaharu Nakasone; Yusuke Taira; Yoshihisa Arakaki; Tomoko Nakamoto; Akihiko Wakayama; Takuma Ooyama; Hitoshi Maemoto; Joichi Heianna; Yoichi Aoki
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Carbon Ion Radiobiology.

Authors:  Walter Tinganelli; Marco Durante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 6.575

10.  Modeling Combined Chemotherapy and Particle Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Francesco Tommasino; Shigeru Yamada
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.