Literature DB >> 16176941

Peri-procedural myocardial injury: 2005 update.

Joerg Herrmann1.   

Abstract

During the past three decades, percutaneous coronary intervention has become one of the cardinal treatment strategies for stenotic coronary artery disease. Technical advances, including the introduction of new devices such as stents, have expanded the interventional capabilities of balloon angioplasty. At the same time, there has been a decline in the rate of major adverse cardiac events, including Q-wave acute myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, and cardiac death. Despite these advances, the incidence of post-procedural cardiac marker elevation has not substantially decreased since the first serial assessment 20 years ago. As of now, these post-procedural cardiac marker elevations are considered to represent peri-procedural myocardial injury (PMI) with worse long-term outcome potential. Recent progress has been made for the identification of two main PMI patterns, one near the intervention site (proximal type, PMI type I) and one in the distal perfusion territory of the treated coronary artery (distal type, PMI type II) as well as for preventive strategies. Integrating these new developments into the wealth of clinical information on this topic, this review aims at giving a current perspective on the entity of PMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16176941     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  67 in total

1.  Role of Akt/protein kinase B in the activity of transcriptional coactivator p300.

Authors:  J Chen; S S Halappanavar; J R St-Germain; B K Tsang; Q Li
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Statins before stents: does an ounce of prevention improve outcomes?

Authors:  Paul Frey; David D Waters
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Vitamin C and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Patrice Delafontaine; Asif Anwar
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  The role of vasodilators in the prevention and treatment of no-reflow following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  S A Harding
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Measurement and prevention of myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Patrick Schiano; Philippe Gabriel Steg
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Peri-procedural myocardial infarction is all the same?

Authors:  Hiroyuki Jinnouchi; Kenichi Sakakura; Hideo Fujita
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Microcirculatory significance of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance.

Authors:  Zhiming Wu; Fei Ye; Wei You; Junjie Zhang; Dujiang Xie; Shaoliang Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Platelet-larger cell ratio and the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Monica Verdoia; Lucia Barbieri; Alon Schaffer; Ettore Cassetti; Paolo Marino; Giorgio Bellomo; Fabiola Sinigaglia; Giuseppe De Luca
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Impact of metabolic syndrome on myocardial injury and clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  J Li; S-J Song; J-P Xu; X-Z Zhao; Z-W Xu; X-J Sun; L-F Wang; X-C Yang
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.