BACKGROUND: A majority of patients with cancer who are seriously ill have a preference of dying at home. However, only a minority of patients actually die at home in most Western countries. AIM: To explore factors associated with place of death in an unselected population of patients with cancer. DESIGN OF STUDY: Case-control study. SETTING: County of Funen, Denmark. METHOD: Register linkage from six Danish healthcare registers. RESULTS: The GP's home visit during the last 3 months before death was inversely associated with dying in hospital (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06 to 0.12) and so were community nurses visiting the home (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.48). Furthermore, being married (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.85), and age at death of 40-65 years (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.90) seemed to have an effect. Hospital death was associated with survival time of less than 1 month (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.69 to 3.13). Type of cancer, sex, or residence (urban versus rural) were not associated with a hospital death in this multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Dying at home was, to a higher extent, associated with GP visit and, to a lesser extent, community nurse visit than with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients with cancer. In our view, these findings indicate the importance of the GP in particular. To increase the opportunity to die at home, more research is needed on the role of the GP and the interface between GPs and other providers of health care at home for patients who are terminally ill with cancer.
BACKGROUND: A majority of patients with cancer who are seriously ill have a preference of dying at home. However, only a minority of patients actually die at home in most Western countries. AIM: To explore factors associated with place of death in an unselected population of patients with cancer. DESIGN OF STUDY: Case-control study. SETTING: County of Funen, Denmark. METHOD: Register linkage from six Danish healthcare registers. RESULTS: The GP's home visit during the last 3 months before death was inversely associated with dying in hospital (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06 to 0.12) and so were community nurses visiting the home (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.48). Furthermore, being married (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.85), and age at death of 40-65 years (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.90) seemed to have an effect. Hospital death was associated with survival time of less than 1 month (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.69 to 3.13). Type of cancer, sex, or residence (urban versus rural) were not associated with a hospital death in this multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Dying at home was, to a higher extent, associated with GP visit and, to a lesser extent, community nurse visit than with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients with cancer. In our view, these findings indicate the importance of the GP in particular. To increase the opportunity to die at home, more research is needed on the role of the GP and the interface between GPs and other providers of health care at home for patients who are terminally ill with cancer.
Authors: Irene J Higginson; Ilora Finlay; Danielle M Goodwin; Alison M Cook; Kerry Hood; Adrian G K Edwards; Hannah-Rose Douglas; Charles E Norman Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Lisa Barbera; Jonathan Sussman; Raymond Viola; Amna Husain; Doris Howell; S Lawrence Librach; Hugh Walker; Rinku Sutradhar; Carole Chartier; Lawrence Paszat Journal: Healthc Policy Date: 2010-02
Authors: Anne Dahlhaus; Nicholas Vanneman; Andrea Siebenhofer; Marie Brosche; Corina Guethlin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Thijs Reyniers; Dirk Houttekier; H Roeline Pasman; Robert Vander Stichele; Joachim Cohen; Luc Deliens Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Marylou Cárdenas-Turanzas; María Teresa Carrillo; Horacio Tovalín-Ahumada; Linda Elting Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Debra A Howell; Eve Roman; Helen Cox; Alexandra G Smith; Russell Patmore; Anne C Garry; Martin R Howard Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Mette A Neergaard; Peter Vedsted; Frede Olesen; Ineta Sokolowski; Anders B Jensen; Jens Søndergaard Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.386