Literature DB >> 16176683

Recurrent implantation failure in assisted reproduction: how to counsel and manage. B. Treatment options that have not been proven to benefit the couple.

Bulent Urman1, Kayhan Yakin, Basak Balaban.   

Abstract

The success of assisted reproduction, although gradually increasing over the years, is still less than satisfactory. Many couples have benefited from this treatment; however, many have also been left frustrated following multiple failed attempts. Couples who fail to conceive after multiple IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments often seek treatment options that are new and that have not been offered before. Some of these include immunological testing and treatment, allogenic lymphocyte therapy, intratubal transfer of zygotes and embryos, blastocyst transfer, sequential embryo transfer, assisted hatching, co-cultures, and preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy. Although the evidence behind some of these is more robust, most suffer from lack of well designed randomized trials comparing them with other treatment options. Randomized studies are extremely difficult to conduct, as couples will resist being randomized into a treatment group where previously failed procedures will be repeated. In the mean time, assisted reproduction programmes should resist offering treatment options that are not evidence based, or at least they should share with the couple the information that is available and should stress that none of these is a panacea for their problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16176683     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60847-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  11 in total

Review 1.  The HLA-G 14-bp polymorphism and recurrent implantation failure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Zhongying Huang; Shangwei Li; Zhun Xiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation failure (RIF).

Authors:  Alex Simon; Neri Laufer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Gamete cytogenetic study in couples with implantation failure: aneuploidy rate is increased in both couple members.

Authors:  F Vialard; I Hammoud; D Molina-Gomes; R Wainer; M Bergere; M Albert; M Bailly; P de Mazancourt; J Selva
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Thrombophilia and assisted reproduction technology-any detrimental impact or unnecessary overuse?

Authors:  Baris Ata; Bulent Urman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Should zygote intrafallopian transfer be offered to all patients with unexplained repeated in-vitro fertilization cycle failures?

Authors:  Itai Gat; Jacob Levron; Gil Yerushalmi; Jehoshua Dor; Masha Brengauz; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction.

Authors:  P De Sutter; R Stadhouders; M Dutré; J Gerris; M Dhont
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new?

Authors:  Filippo Ubaldi; Alberto Vaiarelli; Rosario D'Anna; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Intrauterine administration of peripheral mononuclear cells in recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kayhan Yakin; Ozgur Oktem; Bulent Urman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  An endometrial gene expression signature accurately predicts recurrent implantation failure after IVF.

Authors:  Yvonne E M Koot; Sander R van Hooff; Carolien M Boomsma; Dik van Leenen; Marian J A Groot Koerkamp; Mariëtte Goddijn; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Bart C J M Fauser; Frank C P Holstege; Nick S Macklon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Two-year outcome after recurrent implantation failure: prognostic factors and additional interventions.

Authors:  Christiane Kling; Andreas Schmutzler; Georg Wilke; Jürgen Hedderich; Dieter Kabelitz
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.