Baris Ata1, Bulent Urman2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University School of Medicine, Davutpasa Caddesi No: 4, Topkapi, Istanbul, 34010, Turkey. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University School of Medicine, Davutpasa Caddesi No: 4, Topkapi, Istanbul, 34010, Turkey. burman@ku.edu.tr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the studies investigating a possible association between thrombophilia and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcome. METHODS: This is a literature review. RESULTS: Congenital thrombophilias (CoT) are reported to be associated with pregnancy loss. However, the association between CoT and early pregnancy loss is weak and does not necessarily support causation. CoT are more likely to be associated with late fetal loss. Even though data pooled from case-control and cohort studies suggest an increased risk of ART failure in women with CoTs, there seems no association when the analysis is confined to better quality cohort studies. The evidence supporting anticoagulation to improve ART outcome in CoT carriers is weak. Likewise, studies on antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) and ART outcome suffer from multiple methodological limitations and a detrimental impact of APA positivity is controversial. Empirical administration of heparin or low molecular weight heparin to women with recurrent ART failures is supported by weak evidence. Importantly, thrombophilias are likely to increase thrombotic complications after ovarian stimulation for ART. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not support routinely testing for or treatment of thrombophilia in the setting of ART nor in couples with implantation failure. A careful personal and family history should be obtained and a risk assessment for thrombotic complications should be made in every woman undergoing ovarian stimulation. If positive, testing for thrombophilia is warranted.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the studies investigating a possible association between thrombophilia and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcome. METHODS: This is a literature review. RESULTS:Congenital thrombophilias (CoT) are reported to be associated with pregnancy loss. However, the association between CoT and early pregnancy loss is weak and does not necessarily support causation. CoT are more likely to be associated with late fetal loss. Even though data pooled from case-control and cohort studies suggest an increased risk of ART failure in women with CoTs, there seems no association when the analysis is confined to better quality cohort studies. The evidence supporting anticoagulation to improve ART outcome in CoT carriers is weak. Likewise, studies on antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) and ART outcome suffer from multiple methodological limitations and a detrimental impact of APA positivity is controversial. Empirical administration of heparin or low molecular weight heparin to women with recurrent ART failures is supported by weak evidence. Importantly, thrombophilias are likely to increase thrombotic complications after ovarian stimulation for ART. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not support routinely testing for or treatment of thrombophilia in the setting of ART nor in couples with implantation failure. A careful personal and family history should be obtained and a risk assessment for thrombotic complications should be made in every woman undergoing ovarian stimulation. If positive, testing for thrombophilia is warranted.
Authors: Marcello Di Nisio; Anne W S Rutjes; Noemi Ferrante; Gian Mario Tiboni; Franco Cuccurullo; Ettore Porreca Journal: Blood Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hussein S Qublan; Suhair S Eid; Hani A Ababneh; Zouhair O Amarin; Aiman Z Smadi; Farakaid F Al-Khafaji; Yousef S Khader Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2006-07-11 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Izabela Nowak; Aleksandra Bylińska; Karolina Wilczyńska; Andrzej Wiśniewski; Andrzej Malinowski; Jacek R Wilczyński; Paweł Radwan; Michał Radwan; Ewa Barcz; Rafał Płoski; Hanna Motak-Pochrzęst; Małgorzata Banasik; Maciej Sobczyński; Piotr Kuśnierczyk Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 3.240