Literature DB >> 16173215

Comparison of stress fractures of male and female recruits during basic training in the Israeli anti-aircraft forces.

Arnon Gam1, Liav Goldstein, Yuval Karmon, Igor Mintser, Itamar Grotto, Alex Guri, Avishay Goldberg, Nissim Ohana, Erez Onn, Yehezkel Levi, Yaron Bar-Dayan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In military basic training, stress fractures are a common orthopedic problem. Female recruits have a significantly higher incidence of stress fractures than do male recruits. Because the Israeli Defense Forces opened traditionally male roles in combat units to female recruits, their high risk for stress fractures is of concern.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of stress fractures during Israeli Defense Forces anti-aircraft basic training among otherwise healthy young male and female recruits, in terms of anatomic distribution and severity.
DESIGN: Ten mixed gender batteries, including 375 male recruits and 138 female recruits, carried out basic training in the Israeli anti-aircraft corps between November 1999 and January 2003. Each battery was monitored prospectively for 10 weeks of a basic training course. During that time, recruits who were suspected of having an overuse injury went through a protocol that included an orthopedic specialist physical examination followed by a radionuclide technetium bone scan, which was assessed by consultant nuclear medicine experts. The assessment included the anatomic site and the severity of the fractures, labeled as either high severity or low severity.
RESULTS: Stress fractures were significantly more common among female recruits than among male recruits. A total of 42 male (11.2%) and 33 female (23.91%) recruits had positive bone scans for stress fractures (female:male relative ratio, 2.13; p < 0.001). Pelvic, femur, and tibia fractures were significantly more common among female recruits than among male recruits (p < 0.005). Female recruits had significantly more severe fractures in the tibia (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the severity of stress fractures in the femur or metatarsals between male and female recruits, as assessed by radionuclide uptake.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that different training programs be assigned according to gender, in which female recruits would have a lower level of target strain or a more moderate incline of strain in the training program throughout basic training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16173215     DOI: 10.7205/milmed.170.8.710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  7 in total

Review 1.  Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.

Authors:  Yoram Epstein; Ran Yanovich; Daniel S Moran; Yuval Heled
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  The National Osteoporosis Foundation's position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations.

Authors:  C M Weaver; C M Gordon; K F Janz; H J Kalkwarf; J M Lappe; R Lewis; M O'Karma; T C Wallace; B S Zemel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Prospective study of physical activity and risk of developing a stress fracture among preadolescent and adolescent girls.

Authors:  Alison E Field; Catherine M Gordon; Laura M Pierce; Arun Ramappa; Mininder S Kocher
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-04-04

4.  Epidemiology of overuse and acute injuries among competitive collegiate athletes.

Authors:  Jingzhen Yang; Abigail S Tibbetts; Tracey Covassin; Gang Cheng; Saloni Nayar; Erin Heiden
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  Non-Modifiable Risk Factors for Stress Fractures in Military Personnel Undergoing Training: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Grace M Lennox; Patrick M Wood; Ben Schram; Elisa F D Canetti; Vini Simas; Rodney Pope; Robin Orr
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in the military: a qualitative systematic review of the literature from the past two decades and a new prioritizing injury model.

Authors:  Stefan Sammito; Vedran Hadzic; Thomas Karakolis; Karen R Kelly; Susan P Proctor; Ainars Stepens; Graham White; Wes O Zimmermann
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2021-12-10

7.  Evaluation of the performance of females as light infantry soldiers.

Authors:  Aharon S Finestone; Charles Milgrom; Ran Yanovich; Rachel Evans; Naama Constantini; Daniel S Moran
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.