Literature DB >> 16170792

The Danish health care system: evolution--not revolution--in a decentralized system.

Kjeld Møller Pedersen1, Terkel Christiansen, Mickael Bech.   

Abstract

The Danish health care system has undergone gradual changes, but not radical reforms, from 1970 until 2004. Theoretically, the development can be viewed from the perspective of fiscal federalism, decentralization, and incentives embodied in reimbursement systems. Furthermore, path dependence and incrementalism have characterized the system. The Danish health care system is decentralized politically, financially, and operationally. The counties are responsible for health care, and finance it out of county income and property taxes along with block grants from the state. Hospitals are publicly owned while general practitioners are private entrepreneurs working on contract with the counties. Hospital services and GP and specialist services are free, while there are co-payments for drugs, adult dental care, physiotherapy and the like. Co-payments make up close to 19% of total health expenditures. The system has been characterized by expenditure control, reasonable positive development in productivity, and a high degree of patient and citizen satisfaction despite waiting lists. Free choice of hospital was introduced more than 10 years ago. It has recently been expanded so that after waiting 2 months for treatments like elective surgery at public hospitals, citizens can choose either private hospitals or go abroad with full payment from public funds. The thinking behind decentralization gradually has been eroded for a number of reasons. This has led to a reform that will be effective as of January 2007. The number of counties will be reduced, but the new regions retain responsibility for health care. A national earmarked health tax will be introduced so that the regions will receive revenues from state block grants and municipal co-payment, for instance an amount per hospitalization. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16170792     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  19 in total

1.  Role of centralized review processes for making reimbursement decisions on new health technologies in Europe.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Caroline Davis; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-08-30

2.  Potential gains from hospital mergers in Denmark.

Authors:  Troels Kristensen; Peter Bogetoft; Kjeld Moeller Pedersen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2010-07-06

3.  Long-term health outcomes in patients with Prader-Willi Syndrome: a nationwide cohort study in Denmark.

Authors:  E Hedgeman; S P Ulrichsen; S Carter; N C Kreher; K P Malobisky; M M Braun; J Fryzek; M S Olsen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.095

4.  Variable prospective financing in the Danish hospital sector and the development of a Danish case-mix system.

Authors:  Anni Ankjaer-Jensen; Pernille Rosling; Lone Bilde
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2006-08

5.  The Veterans Health Administration: an American success story?

Authors:  Adam Oliver
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Exploring the disparities of regional health care expenditures in Switzerland: some empirical evidence.

Authors:  Oliver Reich; Cornelia Weins; Claudia Schusterschitz; Magdalena Thöni
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-02-03

7.  The impact of decentralization of health care administration on equity in health and health care in Canada.

Authors:  Hai Zhong
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2010-03-10

Review 8.  Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Donald J Philippon; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Prevalence of risk factors for fractures and use of DXA scanning in Danish women. A regional population-based study.

Authors:  K H Rubin; B Abrahamsen; A P Hermann; M Bech; J Gram; K Brixen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Influence of comorbidity on cancer patients' rehabilitation needs, participation in rehabilitation activities and unmet needs: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lise Vilstrup Holm; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Jakob Kragstrup; Christoffer Johansen; Rene dePont Christensen; Peter Vedsted; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.