Literature DB >> 16169671

Assessment of quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N-35 modules.

Mustafa Cengiz1, Enis Ozyar, Mustafa Esassolak, Musa Altun, Müge Akmansu, Mehmet Sen, Omer Uzel, Aydin Yavuz, Gamze Dalmaz, Cem Uzal, Ayşe Hiçsönmez, Süreyya Sarihan, Bünyamin Kaplan, Beste Melek Atasoy, Cüneyt Ulutin, Ufuk Abacioğlu, Ayşe Nur Demiral, Mutlu Hayran.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current study reports on long-term quality of life (QoL) status after conventional radiotherapy in 187 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from 14 centers in Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, who were treated in 14 centers in Turkey with minimum 6 months of follow-up and were in complete remission, were asked to complete Turkish versions of EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the HN-35 module. Each center participated with the required clinical data that included age at diagnosis, gender, symptoms on admission, follow-up period, treatment modalities, radiotherapy dose, and AJCC 1997 tumor stage. Each patient's 33 QoL scores, which included function, global health status, and symptoms, were calculated as instructed in EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range from 0 to 100. A high score represents a higher response level. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U nonparametric tests were used for comparisons.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients with median age of 46 years (range, 16-79 years) participated and completed the questionnaires. Median follow-up time was 3.4 years (range, 6 months-24 years). All patients have received external-beam radiotherapy. Beside external-beam radiotherapy, 59 patients underwent brachytherapy boost, 70 patients received concomitant chemotherapy, and 95 patients received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Most of the patients in the analysis (75%) were in advanced stage (Stage III, n = 85 [45.4%]; Stage IV, n = 55 [29%]). Mean global health status was calculated as 73. Parameters that increased global health status were male gender, early-stage disease, and less than 4-year follow-up (p < 0.05). Functional parameters were better in males and in early-stage disease. Factors that yielded better symptom scores were short interval after treatment (10 scores), male gender (7 scores), and lower radiation dose (6 scores). Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy did not have any effect on QoL, whereas concomitant chemotherapy adversely affected 5 symptom scores.
CONCLUSION: Quality of life is adversely affected in our nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with combined therapies. The factors that adversely affect quality of life are advanced tumor stage, female gender, and long-term follow-up. Further controlled studies to evaluate both preradiotherapy and postradiotherapy status are necessary to clarify the contribution of each treatment modality to QoL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16169671     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  18 in total

1.  A benchmark study on 883 nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated in two Italian centres from 1977 to 2000. Part II: Evolving technical choices and toxicity patterns.

Authors:  S M Magrini; S Tonoli; L Costa; N Pasinetti; F Paiar; L Livi; G Simontacchi; I Meattini; L Pegurri; P Borghetti; P Frata; P Ponticelli; M Buglione; G Biti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Advances in quality of life research among head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Allen C Sherman; Stephanie Simonton
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a clinical dilemma and challenge.

Authors:  Tao Xu; J Tang; M Gu; L Liu; W Wei; H Yang
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Sustained improvement of quality of life for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by intensity modulated radiation therapy in long-term survivors.

Authors:  Tao Song; Ming Fang; Xue-Bang Zhang; Ping Zhang; Rui-Fei Xie; Shi-Xiu Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

5.  Quality of life of nasopharyngeal cancer survivors in China.

Authors:  J S Hong; J Tian; Q F Han; Q Y Ni
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Functional outcomes and rehabilitation strategies in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisette van der Molen; Maya A van Rossum; Lori M Burkhead; Ludi E Smeele; Frans J M Hilgers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Longitudinal quality of life in Turkish patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy.

Authors:  Esra Citak; Zeliha Tulek
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Importance of patient, tumour and treatment related factors on quality of life in head and neck cancer patients after definitive treatment.

Authors:  Zumre Arican Alicikus; Fadime Akman; Ozlem Uruk Ataman; Nihal Dag; Esmahan Orcin; Betul Bakis; Munir Kinay
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Authors:  M T King; D S J Costa; N K Aaronson; J E Brazier; D F Cella; P M Fayers; P Grimison; M Janda; G Kemmler; R Norman; A S Pickard; D Rowen; G Velikova; T A Young; R Viney
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  A Systematic Review of Proton Therapy for the Management of Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Lee; Sarin Kitpanit; Marina Chilov; Johannes A Langendijk; Jiade Lu; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.