Charlotte Paterson1, Nicky Britten. 1. MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Briston BS8 2PR, United Kingdom. c.paterson@bristol.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Accurate individualized data on drug consumption is required for a number of purposes. While electronic medication event monitoring is the best objective measure available, self-report tools would be a useful alternative in certain situations. We searched for validated self-completion questionnaires suitable for measuring change in medication. METHODS: A systematic search of the English language literature since 1980, and a narrative literature review. RESULTS: Few articles described the development or use of self-report methods to measure change in medication over time. We found no questionnaire that was commonly used for this purpose, nor one that had been evaluated and published. Considerable work has been undertaken to develop questionnaires or diaries for individual projects, but because these tools and their validation are rarely published, they are not available for other researchers to use, and comparison across studies is difficult. Some work has been done developing diary formats and the Medication Quantification Scale converts complex medication change data to a single numerical score. CONCLUSION: Medication change is rarely considered as an outcome, and when it is measured, nonstandardized methods are used. More attention needs to be given to developing self-report tools and validating them across a range of criteria.
OBJECTIVE: Accurate individualized data on drug consumption is required for a number of purposes. While electronic medication event monitoring is the best objective measure available, self-report tools would be a useful alternative in certain situations. We searched for validated self-completion questionnaires suitable for measuring change in medication. METHODS: A systematic search of the English language literature since 1980, and a narrative literature review. RESULTS: Few articles described the development or use of self-report methods to measure change in medication over time. We found no questionnaire that was commonly used for this purpose, nor one that had been evaluated and published. Considerable work has been undertaken to develop questionnaires or diaries for individual projects, but because these tools and their validation are rarely published, they are not available for other researchers to use, and comparison across studies is difficult. Some work has been done developing diary formats and the Medication Quantification Scale converts complex medication change data to a single numerical score. CONCLUSION: Medication change is rarely considered as an outcome, and when it is measured, nonstandardized methods are used. More attention needs to be given to developing self-report tools and validating them across a range of criteria.
Authors: Julien Freitag; Jon Ford; Dan Bates; Richard Boyd; Andrew Hahne; Yuanyuan Wang; Flavia Cicuttini; Leesa Huguenin; Cameron Norsworthy; Kiran Shah Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Helen P French; Tara Cusack; Aisling Brennan; Breon White; Clare Gilsenan; Martina Fitzpatrick; Paul O'Connell; David Kane; Oliver Fitzgerald; Geraldine M McCarthy Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2009-01-19 Impact factor: 2.362