Literature DB >> 16166366

Thinking inside the bubble: evidence for a new contextual unit in urban mental health.

Rob Whitley1, Martin Prince, Margaret Cargo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous quantitative research has suggested that there is a link between housing, the urban environment, and mental health. However, methodological and design issues make it difficult to disentangle the relative influence of dwelling specific and wider urban environmental influences on individual mental health. The aim of this study was to explore the link between the dwelling, the immediate urban environment, and mental health to generate a new conceptual framework by which understanding of dwelling and urban environmental influences on mental health can be advanced. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted with 32 inner city residents. Participants, stratified by sex and mental health status, were randomly recruited from a wider quantitative survey. An almost equal number of men and women as well as people with or without mental health problems participated, allowing for comparison of experience. Data were analysed inductively to generate an appropriate theoretical framework regarding dwelling and urban environmental influences on mental health.
SETTING: An inner city neighbourhood of about 6200 people in north west London. Most of that population live in public housing. MAIN
RESULTS: The principal study finding is that between the dwelling unit and the neighbourhood unit, evidence was found for another meaningful contextual unit of analysis, the "residential bubble" through which effects on mental health can be mediated. The residential bubble describes a limited area of three dimensional space that surrounds a dwelling, encompassing immediate neighbours (above, below, and adjacent) and shared public space bordering the dwelling. Positive events and processes within the bubble had a beneficial influence on mental health whereas negative ones tended to have a damaging influence. These seemed to disproportionately have an impact on people with pre-existing mental health problems.
CONCLUSION: The concept of the "residential bubble" may be a meaningful new contextual unit of analysis in urban mental health. This may have important implications with regards to interventions and measurement development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16166366      PMCID: PMC1732909          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2004.030353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  17 in total

1.  Social inequality, population health, and housing: a study of two Vancouver neighborhoods.

Authors:  J R Dunn; M V Hayes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Housing and health: time again for public health action.

Authors:  James Krieger; Donna L Higgins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Quality of accommodation and risk of depression in later life: an analysis of prospective data from the Gospel Oak Project.

Authors:  Robert Stewart; Martin Prince; Rowan Harwood; Robert Whitley; Anthony Mann
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.485

Review 4.  Social capital and psychiatry: review of the literature.

Authors:  Rob Whitley; Kwame McKenzie
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy.

Authors:  R J Sampson; S W Raudenbush; F Earls
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Mental health and the built environment: cross-sectional survey of individual and contextual risk factors for depression.

Authors:  Scott Weich; Martin Blanchard; Martin Prince; Elizabeth Burton; Bob Erens; Kerry Sproston
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 7.  Social ties and mental health.

Authors:  I Kawachi; L F Berkman
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: its use in a community sample.

Authors:  R E Roberts; S W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Housing and health in Germany.

Authors:  C E Pollack; O von dem Knesebeck; J Siegrist
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 10.  The built environment and mental health.

Authors:  Gary W Evans
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.671

View more
  1 in total

1.  Importance of thinking locally for mental health: data from cross-sectional surveys representing South East London and England.

Authors:  Stephani L Hatch; Charlotte Woodhead; Souci Frissa; Nicola T Fear; Maria Verdecchia; Robert Stewart; Abraham Reichenberg; Craig Morgan; Paul Bebbington; Sally McManus; Traolach Brugha; Bwalya Kankulu; Jennifer L Clark; Billy Gazard; Robert Medcalf; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.