Literature DB >> 16165219

Immune responses and protection by vaccine and various vaccine adjuvant candidates to virulent porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Wasin Charerntantanakul1, Ratree Platt, Wesley Johnson, Michael Roof, Eric Vaughn, James A Roth.   

Abstract

Various vaccine adjuvant candidates were assessed with the modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (MLV PRRSV) (Ingelvac PRRS MLV) vaccine. Their influence on humoral-mediated immune (HMI) and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses as well as protection from virulent PRRSV challenge (MN-184) was evaluated. Ninety seronegative pigs were randomly divided into nine groups of 10 pigs. One group received MLV vaccine alone. Five groups received MLV vaccine with either bacterial endotoxin-derived adjuvant (ET), mixed open reading frame 5 (ORF5) peptides derived from various PRRSV isolates, porcine interferon alpha (IFNalpha), polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized with polylysine and carboxymethylcellulose (poly-ICLC), or porcine interleukin-12 (IL-12). One group did not receive MLV vaccine but was immunized with ORF5 peptides conjugated with cholera toxin (ORF5 peptide/CT). Two groups served as challenged and unchallenged non-vaccinated controls. Four-color flow cytometry was utilized to simultaneously identify three major porcine T-cell surface markers (CD4, CD8, and gammadelta TCR) and detect activation marker CD25 (alpha chain of IL-2 receptor) or intracellular IFNgamma. The MLV PRRSV vaccine alone successfully primed CD4(-)CD8(+)gammadelta- T-cells as demonstrated by a significant increase in %IFNgamma+ cells when live PRRSV was used as a recall antigen. Booster immunizations of mixed ORF5 peptides and co-administration of IL-12 with MLV PRRSV vaccine significantly enhanced IFNgamma expression by some T-cell subsets (CD4(-)CD8(+)gammadelta+ and CD4(-)CD8(-)gammadelta+ for mixed ORF5 peptides and CD4(+)CD8(+)gammadelta- and CD4(-)CD8(+)gammadelta+ for IL-12). All groups receiving MLV-vaccine with or without adjuvants had reduced lung lesions after challenge. The group immunized with only ORF5 peptide/CT did not have significant T-cell recall responses and was not protected from challenge. Expression of IFNgamma by several T-cell subsets correlated with reduced lung lesions and viremia, whereas expression of CD25 did not. Expression of surface CD25 did not correlate with IFNgamma production. PRRSV ELISA s/p ratio prior to challenge also correlated with reduced lung lesions and viremia. In conclusion, booster immunizations of the mixed ORF5 peptides and co-administration of IL-12 effectively enhanced the CMI response to MLV vaccine. However, neither adjuvant significantly contributed to reducing clinical effects when compared to MLV alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16165219     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol        ISSN: 0165-2427            Impact factor:   2.046


  25 in total

Review 1.  Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccines: Immunogenicity, efficacy and safety aspects.

Authors:  Wasin Charerntantanakul
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2012-02-12

2.  Pathological and immunological characteristics of piglets infected experimentally with a HP-PRRSV TJ strain.

Authors:  Zhenguang Li; Yanliang He; Xiaoqin Xu; Xue Leng; Shufen Li; Yongjun Wen; Fengxue Wang; Mingqi Xia; Shipeng Cheng; Hua Wu
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 3.  Advances in swine immunology help move vaccine technology forward.

Authors:  Michael P Murtaugh
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.046

4.  Suppression of immune responses in pigs by nonstructural protein 1 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Yefei Zhou; Juan Bai; Yufeng Li; Xinglong Wang; Xianwei Wang; Ping Jiang
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Immunopotentiation of four natural adjuvants co-administered with a highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus glycoprotein 5 subunit.

Authors:  Jun Peng; Yanmei Yuan; Si Shen; Zhongxiang Niu; Yijun Du; Jiaqiang Wu; Jun Li; Jiang Yu; Tao Wang; Jinbao Wang
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.332

6.  Antiviral regulation in porcine monocytic cells at different activation states.

Authors:  Yongming Sang; Raymond R R Rowland; Frank Blecha
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  A Synthetic Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Strain Confers Unprecedented Levels of Heterologous Protection.

Authors:  Hiep L X Vu; Fangrui Ma; William W Laegreid; Asit K Pattnaik; David Steffen; Alan R Doster; Fernando A Osorio
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Detection of asymptomatic antigenemia in pigs infected by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) by a novel capture immunoassay with monoclonal antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein of PRRSV.

Authors:  Jian-Piao Cai; Ya-Di Wang; Herman Tse; Hua Xiang; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Xiao-Yan Che
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-10-14

9.  A modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine protects late-term pregnancy gilts against a heterologous PRRSV-2 challenge.

Authors:  Siyeon Yang; Ikjae Kang; Hyejean Cho; Taehwan Oh; Kee Hwan Park; Kyung-Duk Min; Chanhee Chae
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.310

10.  Functional impairment of PRRSV-specific peripheral CD3+CD8high cells.

Authors:  Sarah Costers; David J Lefebvre; Bruno Goddeeris; Peter L Delputte; Hans J Nauwynck
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.