PURPOSE: Because there is little information about the training that general internists require to perform hand-carried cardiac ultrasonography (HCU), we studied the rate of learning of a group of medical residents performing HCU after minimal formal training. METHODS: Medical residents on the inpatient services at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center received formal training in HCU consisting of 15-30 minutes of didactic instruction about the principles of echocardiography, followed by ongoing one-on-one instruction in performing HCU and subsequent ongoing one-on-one training from a certified echocardiography technician as they were doing scans. The residents were shown how to position the patient to obtain 2-dimensional echo images from the parasternal short and long axes and apical 4-chamber views, and how to obtain color-flow Doppler images across the mitral and aortic valves. Residents were asked to determine whether pericardial effusion was present and to assess left ventricular size, left ventricular function, and the mitral and aortic valves. The residents performed cardiac physical examination and HCU independently on patients who had a conventional transthoracic echocardiogram (CTTE) performed within 24 hours of the HCU. The residents' HCU results were compared with the CTTE results by a cardiologist specializing in echocardiography. The rates at which residents gained technical proficiency and skills in interpreting their studies were measured by linear regression to fit various outcome variables against their experience at scanning as gauged by the number of scans performed. RESULTS: Thirty medical residents performed a total of 231 HCU studies. Linear regression models showed that the residents' overall technical proficiency skills improved at the rate of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.04) points on an overall assessment index (0-3 scale) per 10 scans completed. Interpretation accuracy improved at a rate of 1.01 (95% CI 0.69-1.39) points per 10 scans as measured by an interpretation accuracy index (0-3 scale). Because scanning efforts and instruction in HCU occurred during residents' usual rotation duties, some residents gathered experience in HCU slowly and sporadically. CONCLUSION: This study, the first prospective, experimental effort of its kind, shows that residents as a group learned important aspects of HCU scanning and interpretation at a reasonably rapid rate.
PURPOSE: Because there is little information about the training that general internists require to perform hand-carried cardiac ultrasonography (HCU), we studied the rate of learning of a group of medical residents performing HCU after minimal formal training. METHODS: Medical residents on the inpatient services at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center received formal training in HCU consisting of 15-30 minutes of didactic instruction about the principles of echocardiography, followed by ongoing one-on-one instruction in performing HCU and subsequent ongoing one-on-one training from a certified echocardiography technician as they were doing scans. The residents were shown how to position the patient to obtain 2-dimensional echo images from the parasternal short and long axes and apical 4-chamber views, and how to obtain color-flow Doppler images across the mitral and aortic valves. Residents were asked to determine whether pericardial effusion was present and to assess left ventricular size, left ventricular function, and the mitral and aortic valves. The residents performed cardiac physical examination and HCU independently on patients who had a conventional transthoracic echocardiogram (CTTE) performed within 24 hours of the HCU. The residents' HCU results were compared with the CTTE results by a cardiologist specializing in echocardiography. The rates at which residents gained technical proficiency and skills in interpreting their studies were measured by linear regression to fit various outcome variables against their experience at scanning as gauged by the number of scans performed. RESULTS: Thirty medical residents performed a total of 231 HCU studies. Linear regression models showed that the residents' overall technical proficiency skills improved at the rate of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.04) points on an overall assessment index (0-3 scale) per 10 scans completed. Interpretation accuracy improved at a rate of 1.01 (95% CI 0.69-1.39) points per 10 scans as measured by an interpretation accuracy index (0-3 scale). Because scanning efforts and instruction in HCU occurred during residents' usual rotation duties, some residents gathered experience in HCU slowly and sporadically. CONCLUSION: This study, the first prospective, experimental effort of its kind, shows that residents as a group learned important aspects of HCU scanning and interpretation at a reasonably rapid rate.
Authors: Jason C Ojeda; James A Colbert; Xinyi Lin; Graham T McMahon; Peter M Doubilet; Carol B Benson; Justina Wu; Joel T Katz; Maria A Yialamas Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 5.128