Literature DB >> 16164452

Does severity of low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges reflect severity of allergic reactions to peanut in the community?

J O'B Hourihane1, K E C Grimshaw, S A Lewis, R A Briggs, J B Trewin, R M King, S A Kilburn, J O Warner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The severity of allergic reactions to food appears to be affected by many interacting factors. It is uncertain whether challenge-based reactions reflect the severity of past reactions or can predict future risk.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship of a subject's clinical history of past reactions to the severity of reaction elicited by a low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with peanut.
METHOD: Cross-sectional questionnaire assessment of community-based allergic reactions and low-dose DBPCFC in self-selected peanut-allergic subjects. Reaction severity was assessed using a novel scoring system, taking account of the dose of allergen ingested.
RESULTS: Forty subjects (15 males, 23 children, 23 asthmatics by history) were studied. Only the most recent community reaction predicted the severity of reaction in the DBPCFC, but even this association was weak (r=0.37, P=0.03). Peanut-specific IgE (PsIgE) and skin prick test (SPT) weal size were not associated with community score but PsIgE level correlated well with the challenge score (r=0.6, P=0.001). Asthma did not affect the eliciting dose or challenge score directly but the association of PsIgE and challenge score was stronger in those without asthma (r=0.72, P=0.001) than in those with asthma (r=0.48, P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The scoring system developed appears to improve the sensitivity of assessment of reactions induced by DBPCFC. This is the first prospective study showing an association between PsIgE levels and clinical reactivity in DBPCFC, an effect that is more pronounced in non-asthmatics. This finding has important implications for the clinical care of subjects with food allergy. There is a poor correlation between the severity of reported reactions in the community and the severity of reaction elicited during low-dose DBPCFC with peanut.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16164452     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02312.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  24 in total

Review 1.  Allergic reaction to peanuts: can we predict reaction severity in the wild?

Authors:  Aisling Flinn; Jonathan O'B Hourihane
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  The likelihood of remission of food allergy in children: when is the optimal time for challenge?

Authors:  Robert A Wood
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Recognition and management of food-induced anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Corinne Keet
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.278

4.  Are plasma IL-10 levels a useful marker of human clinical tolerance in peanut allergy?

Authors:  Larisa C Lotoski; F Estelle R Simons; Rishma Chooniedass; Joel Liem; Isha Ostopowich; Allan B Becker; Kent T HayGlass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nandinee Patel; Daniel C Adelman; Katherine Anagnostou; Joseph L Baumert; W Marty Blom; Dianne E Campbell; R Sharon Chinthrajah; E N Clare Mills; Bushra Javed; Natasha Purington; Benjamin C Remington; Hugh A Sampson; Alexander D Smith; Ross A R Yarham; Paul J Turner
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Development and validation of the food allergy severity score.

Authors:  Montserrat Fernández-Rivas; Ismael Gómez García; Alejandro Gonzalo-Fernández; Manuel Fuentes Ferrer; Sabine Dölle-Bierke; Guadalupe Marco-Martín; Barbara K Ballmer-Weber; Riccardo Asero; Simona Belohlavkova; Kirsten Beyer; Frédéric de Blay; Michael Clausen; Mareen R Datema; Ruta Dubakiene; Kate E C Grimshaw; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Jonathan O'B Hourihane; Monika Jedrzejczak-Czechowicz; André C Knulst; Tanya Kralimarkova; Thuy-My Le; Nikolaos G Papadopoulos; Todor A Popov; Lars K Poulsen; Ashok Purohit; Suranjith L Seneviratne; Angela Simpson; Atanasios Sinaniotis; Mirjana Turkalji; Sonia Vázquez-Cortés; Rosialzira N Vera-Berrios; Antonella Muraro; Margitta Worm; Graham Roberts; Ronald van Ree; Cristina Fernández-Pérez; Paul J Turner; Elizabeth N Clare Mills
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 14.710

7.  Distinct parameters of the basophil activation test reflect the severity and threshold of allergic reactions to peanut.

Authors:  Alexandra F Santos; George Du Toit; Abdel Douiri; Suzana Radulovic; Alick Stephens; Victor Turcanu; Gideon Lack
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Use of Specific IgE and Skin Prick Test to Determine Clinical Reaction Severity.

Authors:  Von Ta; Brittany Weldon; Grace Yu; Olivier Humblet; Susan Neale-May; Kari Nadeau
Journal:  Br J Med Med Res       Date:  2011

9.  Oral peanut challenge identifies an allergy but the peanut allergen threshold sensitivity is not reproducible.

Authors:  Susanne Glaumann; Anna Nopp; S G O Johansson; Magnus P Borres; Caroline Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Repeat oral food challenges in peanut and tree nut allergic children with a history of mild/moderate reactions.

Authors:  Brynn Kevin Wainstein; Rebecca Anne Saad
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2015-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.