Literature DB >> 1616361

Opinions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis about their own functional capacity: how valid is it?

J W Jacobs1, F G Oosterveld, N Deuxbouts, J J Rasker, E Taal, J Dequeker, R Uytterhoeven.   

Abstract

Self assessment health status questionnaires are increasingly used to measure health status or the effect of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Most of these questionnaires measure functional (physical) disabilities. The question arises, however, as to how well self assessment questionnaires reflect the true functional status of patients or whether they only reflect their imaginary functional capacities. How valid is the opinion of patients with RA about their own functional capacity? To answer this question an investigation was performed in 80 patients with RA. Forty Dutch and 40 Belgian patients with RA completed the functional items of the DUTCH-AIMS, the Dutch version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS), a self assessment questionnaire specific to arthritis. Their scores on the functional scales were compared with the scores on the same scales completed by two experienced physiotherapists after evaluation of the functional ability of these patients. This was achieved by observing the patients perform the tasks given in the questionnaire. Correlation coefficients between the scores of the patients and the physiotherapists were highly significant for all the scales. No significant differences were found between the patients' and physiotherapists' mean scale scores except for the mobility scale in the Dutch patients. The strength of agreement (Cohen's kappa) of most scale scores of the patients and physiotherapists was substantial. The estimates of the overall functional capacity (the mean of the five scale scores) of the Belgian and Dutch patients show high correlations between the patients and the physiotherapists. It is concluded that patients' opinion about their functional ability is valid in that it is in agreement with their real functional abilities. This study provides further evidence for the validity of the DUTCH-AIMS as a measure of functional disability and health status in Dutch and Belgian patients with RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1616361      PMCID: PMC1004743          DOI: 10.1136/ard.51.6.765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  12 in total

1.  DIAGNOSTIC criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: 1958 revision by a committee of the American Rheumatism Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire modified to assess disability in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J R Kirwan; J S Reeback
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1986-05

3.  Assessment of disability caused by rheumatic diseases in general practice.

Authors:  F M Sullivan; R C Eagers; K Lynch; J H Barber
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.

Authors:  M H Liang; M G Larson; K E Cullen; J A Schwartz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1985-05

5.  Outcome assessment in clinical trials. Evidence for the sensitivity of a health status measure.

Authors:  R F Meenan; J J Anderson; L E Kazis; M J Egger; M Altz-Smith; C O Samuelson; R F Willkens; M A Solsky; S P Hayes; K L Blocka
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1984-12

6.  Evaluation of the Dutch Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (DUTCH-AIMS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  E Taal; J W Jacobs; E R Seydel; O Wiegman; J J Rasker
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1989-12

7.  Sensitivity of a health status measure to short-term clinical changes in arthritis.

Authors:  J J Anderson; H E Firschein; R F Meenan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1989-07

8.  Measuring health status in arthritis. The arthritis impact measurement scales.

Authors:  R F Meenan; P M Gertman; J H Mason
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1980-02

9.  The arthritis impact measurement scales. Further investigations of a health status measure.

Authors:  R F Meenan; P M Gertman; J H Mason; R Dunaif
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1982-09

10.  A model of health status for rheumatoid arthritis. A factor analysis of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales.

Authors:  J H Mason; J J Anderson; R F Meenan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1988-06
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Impairment measures in rheumatic disorders for rehabilitation medicine and allied health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raymond A H M Swinkels; Lex M Bouter; Rob A B Oostendorp; Cornelia H M van den Ende
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Doctors' versus patients' global assessments of treatment effectiveness: empirical survey of diverse treatments in clinical trials.

Authors:  Evangelos Evangelou; Georgios Tsianos; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-21

3.  Self report functional disability scores and the use of devices: two distinct aspects of physical function in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A van der Heide; J W Jacobs; G A van Albada-Kuipers; F W Kraaimaat; R Geenen; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Quantifying clinical change: discrepancies between patients' and providers' perspectives.

Authors:  Rachel P Dreyer; Philip G Jones; Shelby Kutty; John A Spertus
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Validation of the shoulder36 for the activities of daily living with shoulder disorders.

Authors:  Satoshi Shimo; Yuta Sakamoto; Takashi Amari; Shota Gemma
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-04-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.