Literature DB >> 16163512

A comparative study of voice complaints and risk factors for voice complaints in female student teachers and practicing teachers early in their career.

G Thomas1, P G C Kooijman, C W R J Cremers, F I C R S de Jong.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was performed to compare female student teachers (454 subjects; 1st to 4th year of training) and practicing teachers (82 female teachers; 1st to 4th year of teaching career) of primary education early in their career, with regard to risk factors perceived to be a negative influence on the voice, and the relative risk of the given risk factors for voice complaints. This enables the observation of whether there is a sudden increase or difference in the perceived risk factors after starting a professional teaching career. Additionally, the existence of a history of voice problems during training was questioned among the teachers. Teachers with voice complaints compared to teachers without voice complaints reported a history of voice complaints during their training (P =0.013). Teachers compared to student teachers reported more voice complaints at the moment and/or during the past year (P =0.002). The following data were obtained from student teachers and teachers reporting voice complaints. Only around a third of the subjects of both groups sought voice care (P =0.286-0.893). Risk factors were estimated in relation to voice complaints. Student teachers reported less frequently than teachers that stress (P =0.014), work pressure (P =0.003) and the composition of the class (P =0.013) have a negative influence on their voice. Student teachers reported less frequently than teachers that the number of people they communicate with (P <0.001) and the deterioration of their general physical condition (P =0.010) have a negative influence on their voice. Student teachers reported more frequently than teachers that environmental irritants (P <0.001) and humidity (P =0.020) of the classroom have a negative influence on their voice. Student teachers more than teachers were of the opinion that the attention paid to the voice during their training was sufficient (P <0.001). To test whether professional status (student teacher versus teacher) is an effect modifier for the risk factors, odds ratios (OR) were compared between the group of teachers and of student teachers (total group with and without voice complaints) to search for interactions between the risk factors and professional status. There is a significant difference in the pattern of risk factors for student teachers and teachers (P =0.010). There is an indication that vocal loading factors and environmental factors are more influential in student teachers and that there is a tendency for psycho-emotional factors to be more influential for teachers early in their career.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16163512     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-005-1010-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  25 in total

1.  Review: occupational risks for voice problems.

Authors:  K Verdolini; L O Ramig
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.487

2.  The prevalence of voice disorders among day care center teachers compared with nurses: a questionnaire and clinical study.

Authors:  E Sala; A Laine; S Simberg; J Pentti; J Suonpää
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Vocal behavior and vocal loading factors for preschool teachers at work studied with binaural DAT recordings.

Authors:  Maria Södersten; Svante Granqvist; Britta Hammarberg; Annika Szabo
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Impact and prevention of voice problems in the teaching profession: embracing the consumers' view.

Authors:  Edwin M L Yiu
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other occupations.

Authors:  E Smith; J Lemke; M Taylor; H L Kirchner; H Hoffman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Measuring voice under teachers' working circumstances: F0 and perturbation features in maximally sustained phonation.

Authors:  L Rantala; T Määttä; E Vilkman
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 0.849

7.  Frequency and effects of teachers' voice problems.

Authors:  E Smith; S D Gray; H Dove; L Kirchner; H Heras
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Prevalence of voice disorders among future teachers.

Authors:  S Simberg; A Laine; E Sala; A M Rönnemaa
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population.

Authors:  Nelson Roy; Ray M Merrill; Susan Thibeault; Rahul A Parsa; Steven D Gray; Elaine M Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  Muscle misuse voice disorders: description and classification.

Authors:  M D Morrison; L A Rammage
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prevalence and risk factors for voice problems in priests.

Authors:  Irena Hocevar-Boltezar
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Effect of teacher's working conditions on voice disorder in Korea: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Yi-Ryoung Lee; Hyoung-Ryoul Kim; Seyoung Lee
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-07-03

3.  Lysozyme in the treatment of non-infectious sore throat.

Authors:  Una Glamočlija; Meliha Mehić; Aziz Šukalo; Amna Tanović Avdić; Jasna Džananović Jaganjac
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.363

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.