Literature DB >> 16163049

High-resolution imaging of the spine using multidetector-row computed tomography: differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.

Takao Kubota1, Kei Yamada, Hirotoshi Ito, Osamu Kizu, Tsunehiko Nishimura.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) images to distinguish between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.
METHODS: Computed tomography images of 45 benign compression fractures in 40 patients and 33 malignant compression fractures in 33 patients were evaluated. A 16-slice multidetector-row CT scanner was used for data acquisition, and axial images with a slice thickness of 1 mm and sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstruction images with a slice thickness of 0.7 to 1 mm were used for interpretation.
RESULTS: The following findings were significantly more frequent in malignant fractures: destruction of the anterolateral and/or posterior cortex of the vertebral body, destruction of the cancellous bone of the vertebral body, destruction of the end plate, destruction of the pedicle, a paraspinal soft tissue mass, and an epidural mass. The extremely reliable signs of malignancy were destruction of the anterolateral and/or posterior cortex of vertebral body (100% accuracy) and destruction of the cancellous bone of the vertebral body (97.4% accuracy).
CONCLUSION: High-resolution CT can provide many useful signs for differentiating between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures, and its diagnostic ability is sufficient for clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16163049     DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000175500.41836.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  5 in total

1.  Bone density, geometry, microstructure, and stiffness: Relationships between peripheral and central skeletal sites assessed by DXA, HR-pQCT, and cQCT in premenopausal women.

Authors:  X Sherry Liu; Adi Cohen; Elizabeth Shane; Perry T Yin; Emily M Stein; Halley Rogers; Shannon L Kokolus; Donald J McMahon; Joan M Lappe; Robert R Recker; Thomas Lang; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Does the META score evaluating osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral fractures have enough agreement to be used by orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of training?

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Pablo Besa; Sergio Morales; Antonio Parlange; Sebastian Flores; Mauricio Campos; Sebastian Mobarec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Differentiation between acute osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral body fractures by imaging].

Authors:  T Geith; M Reiser; A Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  PET/CT-negative malignant spine tumor with pathologic fracture: A case report of malignant solitary bone plasmacytoma.

Authors:  Kang-Un Kim; Joon Hyuk Choi; Gun Woo Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Use of FDG-PET in differentiating benign from malignant compression fractures.

Authors:  Miriam A Bredella; Brendan Essary; Martin Torriani; Hugue A Ouellette; William E Palmer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.