OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) images to distinguish between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. METHODS: Computed tomography images of 45 benign compression fractures in 40 patients and 33 malignant compression fractures in 33 patients were evaluated. A 16-slice multidetector-row CT scanner was used for data acquisition, and axial images with a slice thickness of 1 mm and sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstruction images with a slice thickness of 0.7 to 1 mm were used for interpretation. RESULTS: The following findings were significantly more frequent in malignant fractures: destruction of the anterolateral and/or posterior cortex of the vertebral body, destruction of the cancellous bone of the vertebral body, destruction of the end plate, destruction of the pedicle, a paraspinal soft tissue mass, and an epidural mass. The extremely reliable signs of malignancy were destruction of the anterolateral and/or posterior cortex of vertebral body (100% accuracy) and destruction of the cancellous bone of the vertebral body (97.4% accuracy). CONCLUSION: High-resolution CT can provide many useful signs for differentiating between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures, and its diagnostic ability is sufficient for clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) images to distinguish between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. METHODS: Computed tomography images of 45 benign compression fractures in 40 patients and 33 malignant compression fractures in 33 patients were evaluated. A 16-slice multidetector-row CT scanner was used for data acquisition, and axial images with a slice thickness of 1 mm and sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstruction images with a slice thickness of 0.7 to 1 mm were used for interpretation. RESULTS: The following findings were significantly more frequent in malignant fractures: destruction of the anterolateral and/or posterior cortex of the vertebral body, destruction of the cancellous bone of the vertebral body, destruction of the end plate, destruction of the pedicle, a paraspinal soft tissue mass, and an epidural mass. The extremely reliable signs of malignancy were destruction of the anterolateral and/or posterior cortex of vertebral body (100% accuracy) and destruction of the cancellous bone of the vertebral body (97.4% accuracy). CONCLUSION: High-resolution CT can provide many useful signs for differentiating between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures, and its diagnostic ability is sufficient for clinical use.
Authors: X Sherry Liu; Adi Cohen; Elizabeth Shane; Perry T Yin; Emily M Stein; Halley Rogers; Shannon L Kokolus; Donald J McMahon; Joan M Lappe; Robert R Recker; Thomas Lang; X Edward Guo Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Julio Urrutia; Pablo Besa; Sergio Morales; Antonio Parlange; Sebastian Flores; Mauricio Campos; Sebastian Mobarec Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Miriam A Bredella; Brendan Essary; Martin Torriani; Hugue A Ouellette; William E Palmer Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2008-02-16 Impact factor: 2.199