Literature DB >> 16159869

Prevention of left ventricular remodeling with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after acute myocardial infarction: final 1-year results of the Front-Integrated Revascularization and Stem Cell Liberation in Evolving Acute Myocardial Infarction by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (FIRSTLINE-AMI) Trial.

Hüseyin Ince1, Michael Petzsch, Hans Dieter Kleine, Heike Eckard, Tim Rehders, Detlev Burska, Stephan Kische, Mathias Freund, Christoph A Nienaber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical evidence has recently shown that pluripotent stem cells can be mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and may enhance myocardial regeneration early after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) management of acute myocardial infarction. Sustained or long-term effects of mobilized CD34-positive mononuclear stem cells, however, are unknown. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI with stenting and abciximab were selected for the study 85+/-30 minutes after PCI; 15 patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous G-CSF at 10 microg/kg body weight for 6 days in addition to standard care including aspirin, clopidogrel, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, beta-blocking agents, and statins. In patients with comparable demographics and clinical and infarct-related characteristics, G-CSF stimulation led to sustained mobilization of CD34 positive mononuclear cells (MNC(CD34+)), with a 20-fold increase (from 3+/-2 at baseline to 66+/-54 MNC(CD34+)/microL on day 6; P<0.001); there was no evidence of leukocytoclastic effects, accelerated restenosis rate, or any late adverse events. Within 4 months, G-CSF-induced MNC(CD34+) mobilization led to enhanced resting wall thickening in the infarct zone of 1.16+/-0.29 mm (P<0.05 versus control), which was sustained at 1.20+/-0.28 after 12 months (P<0.001 versus control). Similarly, left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 48+/-4% at baseline to 54+/-8% at 4 months (P<0.005 versus control) and 56+/-9% at 12 months (P<0.003 versus control and paralleled by sustained improvement of wall-motion score index from 1.70+/-0.22 to 1.42+/-0.26 and 1.33+/-0.21 at 4 and 12 months, respectively), after G-CSF (P<0.05 versus baseline and P<0.03 versus controls). Accordingly, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter showed no remodeling and stable left ventricular dimensions after G-CSF stimulation, whereas left ventricular end-diastolic diameter in controls revealed enlargement from 55+/-4 mm at baseline to 58+/-4 mm (P<0.05 versus baseline) at 12 months after infarction and no improvement in diastolic function.
CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization of MNC(CD34+) by G-CSF after primary PCI may offer a pragmatic strategy for improvement in ventricular function and prevention of left ventricular remodeling 1 year after acute myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16159869     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.524827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  38 in total

1.  Neuroprotective therapy using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with worsening symptoms of compression myelopathy, Part 1: a phase I and IIa clinical trial.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Sakuma; Masashi Yamazaki; Akihiko Okawa; Hiroshi Takahashi; Kei Kato; Mitsuhiro Hashimoto; Koichi Hayashi; Takeo Furuya; Takayuki Fujiyoshi; Junko Kawabe; Chikato Mannoji; Ryo Kadota; Masayuki Hashimoto; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masao Koda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Imaging stem cells implanted in infarcted myocardium.

Authors:  Rong Zhou; Paul D Acton; Victor A Ferrari
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Overview of stem cells and imaging modalities for cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Gwendolen Y Chang; Xiaoyan Xie; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Cell-based therapies after myocardial injury.

Authors:  Hüseyin Ince; Christof Stamm; Christoph A Nienaber
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-12

Review 5.  Stem cell differentiation: cardiac repair.

Authors:  Michael Rubart; Loren J Field
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 2.481

Review 6.  Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Il-Kwon Ko; Byung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Int J Stem Cells       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 7.  Coronary vessel development and insight towards neovascular therapy.

Authors:  Nicola Smart; Karina N Dubé; Paul R Riley
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Cardiac cell therapy: the next (re)generation.

Authors:  Elvira Forte; Isotta Chimenti; Lucio Barile; Roberto Gaetani; Francesco Angelini; Vittoria Ionta; Elisa Messina; Alessandro Giacomello
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 9.  Stem and progenitor cell-based therapy in ischaemic heart disease: promise, uncertainties, and challenges.

Authors:  Jörn Tongers; Douglas W Losordo; Ulf Landmesser
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Therapeutic myocardial angiogenesis.

Authors:  Marie-Ange Renault; Douglas W Losordo
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.