Literature DB >> 16158802

Simplified and quantitative saliva buffer capacity test using a hand-held pH meter.

Yuichi Kitasako1, Michiyo Moritsuka, Richard M Foxton, Masaomi Ikeda, Junji Tagami, Satoshi Nomura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare saliva buffer capacity using a hand-held pH meter and a commercial buffer strip in patients at risk of caries.
METHODS: To obtain stimulated saliva, 109 patients were given a paraffin wax to chew for 5 minutes. After reading the pH value of 0.5 ml of tested saliva using a portable hand-held pH meter (B-212), 10 microl of 0.1N HCl was titrated into the obtained saliva up to a total titration of 160 microl, and then the pH value read each time. The commercial buffer strip (CRT) was also evaluated. The correlation in ranking results (high, medium, low) between the B-212 pH meter and CRT buffer were statistically analyzed by the Bartlett's test (P < 0.001).
RESULTS: At the point of 50 microd of titrated HCl, the individual saliva buffer capacities were ranked into one of the following three categories; high (above pH 5.5), medium (pH from 5.5 to 4.5) and low (below pH 4.5). The percentages of the tested patients for the different ranks (high, medium, low) of buffer capacity were 50%, 17% and 33% respectively for the B-212 pH meter, and 56%, 17% and 27% respectively for the CRT. For the CRT buffer, 23 out of 109 cases showed inconclusive color change under the colorimetric test. There was significant correlation between ranking buffer capacity measured by the B-212 pH meter and the CRT buffer (P < 0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16158802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  8 in total

1.  Remineralization capacity of carious and non-carious white spot lesions: clinical evaluation using ICDAS and SS-OCT.

Authors:  Yuichi Kitasako; Alireza Sadr; Yasushi Shimada; Masaomi Ikeda; Yasunori Sumi; Junji Tagami
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of three strip-type tests and two laboratory methods for salivary buffering analysis.

Authors:  Zeinab Cheaib; Carolina Ganss; Andreas Lamanda; Melek Dilek Turgut; Adrian Lussi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Saliva secretion is reduced in mild reflux esophagitis patients.

Authors:  Mai Koeda; Tomohide Tanabe; Yuichi Kitasako; Eri Momma; Yoshimasa Hoshikawa; Shintaro Hoshino; Noriyuki Kawami; Mitsuru Kaise; Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 4.230

4.  Saliva secretion is reduced in proton pump inhibitor-responsive non-erosive reflux disease patients.

Authors:  Mai Koeda; Tomohide Tanabe; Yuichi Kitasako; Eri Momma; Yoshimasa Hoshikawa; Shintaro Hoshino; Noriyuki Kawami; Mitsuru Kaise; Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.230

5.  Stimulated saliva secretion is reduced in proton pump inhibitor-resistant severe reflux esophagitis patients.

Authors:  Tomohide Tanabe; Mai Koeda; Yuichi Kitasako; Eri Momma; Yoshimasa Hoshikawa; Shintaro Hoshino; Noriyuki Kawami; Mitsuru Kaise; Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.230

6.  A clinical study to compare between resting and stimulated whole salivary flow rate and pH before and after complete denture placement in different age groups.

Authors:  B C Muddugangadhar; Rajashekar Sangur; I V Rudraprasad; D B Nandeeshwar; B H Dhanya Kumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

7.  Sympathomimetic effects of chronic methamphetamine abuse on oral health: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Niklas Rommel; Nils H Rohleder; Steffen Koerdt; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Roland Härtel-Petri; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Marco R Kesting
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Effects of a food enriched with probiotics on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. salivary counts in preschool children: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Judy Villavicencio; Lina Maria Villegas; Maria Cristina Arango; Susana Arias; Francia Triana
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.698

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.