Literature DB >> 16157400

A feasibility study for image guided radiotherapy using low dose, high speed, cone beam X-ray volumetric imaging.

Jonathan R Sykes1, Ali Amer, Jadwiga Czajka, Christopher J Moore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Image Guidance of patient set-up for radiotherapy can be achieved by acquiring X-ray volumetric images (XVI) with Elekta Synergy and registering these to the planning CT scan. This enables full 3D registration of structures from similar 3D imaging modalities and offers superior image quality, rotational set-up information and a large field of view. This study uses the head section of the Rando phantom to demonstrate a new paradigm of faster, lower dose XVI that still allows registration to high precision.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One high exposure XVI scan and one low exposure XVI scan were performed with a Rando Head Phantom. The second scan was used to simulate ultra low dose, fast acquisition, full and half scans by discarding a large number of projections before reconstruction. Dose measurements were performed using Thermo Luminescent Dosimeters (TLD) and an ion chamber. The reconstructed XVI scans were automatically registered with a helical CT scan of the Rando Head using the volumetric, grey-level, cross-correlation algorithm implemented in the Syntegra software package (Philips Medical Systems). Reproducibility of the registration process was investigated.
RESULTS: In both XVI scans the body surface, bone-tissue and tissue air interfaces were clearly visible. Although the subjective image quality of the low dose cone beam scan was reduced, registration of both cone beam scans with the planning CT scan agreed within 0.1 mm and 0.1 degrees . Dose to the patient was reduced from 28mGy to less than 1mGy and the equivalent scan speed reduced to one minute or less.
CONCLUSIONS: Automatic 3D registration of high speed, ultra low dose XVI scans with the planning CT scan can be used for precision 3D patient set-up verification/image guidance on a daily basis with out loss of accuracy when compared to higher dose XVI scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16157400     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  26 in total

1.  Assessment of dose reconstruction errors in image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Elisabeth Weiss; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Quality and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography gated by active breathing control.

Authors:  Bria P Thompson; Geoffrey D Hugo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Progressive cone beam CT dose control in image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hao Yan; Xin Zhen; Laura Cerviño; Steve B Jiang; Xun Jia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Cakes for cure: the role of charities in the embedding of innovative cancer treatment technologies.

Authors:  Lisa Ashmore
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Effect of dose reduction on image registration and image quality for cone-beam CT in radiotherapy.

Authors:  B Loutfi-Krauss; J Köhn; N Blümer; K Freundl; T Koch; E Kara; C Scherf; C Rödel; U Ramm; J Licher
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Impact of reduction of flux overlap region on kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography image quality and patients' exposure dose.

Authors:  Daisuke Kawahara; Shuichi Ozawa; Yuji Murakami; Takeo Nakashima; Masamichi Aita; Shintaro Tsuda; Yusuke Ochi; Takuro Okumura; Hirokazu Masuda; Yoshimi Ohno; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-05-16

7.  An evaluation of four CT-MRI co-registration techniques for radiotherapy treatment planning of prone rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  C J Dean; J R Sykes; R A Cooper; P Hatfield; B Carey; S Swift; S E Bacon; D Thwaites; D Sebag-Montefiore; A M Morgan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Surface imaging, portal imaging, and skin marker set-up vs. CBCT for radiotherapy of the thorax and pelvis.

Authors:  Stefania Pallotta; Eleonora Vanzi; Gabriele Simontacchi; Livia Marrazzo; Marco Ceroti; Fabiola Paiar; Lorenzo Livi; Marta Bucciolini
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Impact of residual and intrafractional errors on strategy of correction for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Gang Cai; Wei-Gang Hu; Jia-Yi Chen; Xiao-Li Yu; Zi-Qiang Pan; Zhao-Zhi Yang; Xiao-Mao Guo; Zhi-Min Shao; Guo-Liang Jiang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Recent advances in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Sameer K Nath; Daniel R Simpson; Brent S Rose; Ajay P Sandhu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.