Literature DB >> 16156140

On the classic and modern theories of matching.

J J McDowell1.   

Abstract

Classic matching theory, which is based on Herrnstein's (1961) original matching equation and includes the well-known quantitative law of effect, is almost certainly false. The theory is logically inconsistent with known experimental findings, and experiments have shown that its central constant-k assumption is not tenable. Modern matching theory, which is based on the power function version of the original matching equation, remains tenable, although it has not been discussed or studied extensively. The modern theory is logically consistent with known experimental findings, it predicts the fact and details of the violation of the classic theory's constant-k assumption, and it accurately describes at least some data that are inconsistent with the classic theory.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16156140      PMCID: PMC1243894          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2005.59-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Falsification of matching theory's account of single-alternative responding: Herrnstein's k varies with sucrose concentration.

Authors:  J Dallery; J J McDowell; J S Lancaster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Matching theory in natural human environments.

Authors:  J J McDowell
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1988

4.  Two modern developments in matching theory.

Authors:  J J McDowell
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1989

5.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reanalysis of the equation for simple action.

Authors:  F R Warren-Boulton; A Silberberg; M Gray; R Ollom
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength.

Authors:  G M Heyman; M M Monaghan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  On the falsifiability of matching theory.

Authors:  J J McDowell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Getting It Wrong: Comment on Moore's "Behaviorism and the Stages of Scientific Activity".

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010

2.  Concurrent reinforcement schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior: experimental applications of the matching law.

Authors:  Carrie S W Borrero; Timothy R Vollmer; John C Borrero; Jason C Bourret; Kimberly N Sloman; Andrew L Samaha; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of adding a second reinforcement alternative: implications for Herrnstein's interpretation of r(e).

Authors:  Paul L Soto; Jack J McDowell; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A test of the formal and modern theories of matching.

Authors:  Jesse Dallery; Paul L Soto; J J McDowell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Notes on discounting.

Authors:  Howard Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  An application of the matching law to social dynamics.

Authors:  John C Borrero; Stephany S Crisolo; Qiuchen Tu; Weston A Rieland; Noël A Ross; Monica T Francisco; Kenny Y Yamamoto
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

7.  A computational theory of selection by consequences applied to concurrent schedules.

Authors:  J J McDowell; Marcia L Caron; Saule Kulubekova; John P Berg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure.

Authors:  Ritwik K Niyogi; Yannick-Andre Breton; Rebecca B Solomon; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal; Peter Dayan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Toward a mechanics of adaptive behavior: evolutionary dynamics and matching theory statics.

Authors:  J J McDowell; Andrei Popa
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The isolation of motivational, motoric, and schedule effects on operant performance: a modeling approach.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Janet L Neisewander; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.