Literature DB >> 16153036

Bateman's principle and immunity: phenotypically plastic reproductive strategies predict changes in immunological sex differences.

Kurt A McKean1, Leonard Nunney.   

Abstract

The sexes often differ in the reproductive trait limiting their fitness, an observation known as Bateman's principle. In many species, females are limited by their ability to produce eggs while males are limited by their ability to compete for and successfully fertilize those eggs. As well as promoting the evolution of sex-specific reproductive strategies, this difference may promote sex differences in other life-history traits due to their correlated effects. Sex differences in disease susceptibility and immune function are common. Two hypotheses based on Bateman's principle have been proposed to explain this pattern: that selection to prolong the period of egg production favors improved immune function in females, or that the expression of secondary sexual characteristics reduces immune function in males. Both hypotheses predict a relatively fixed pattern of reduced male immune function, at least in sexually mature individuals. An alternative hypothesis is that Bateman's principle does not dictate fixed patterns of reproductive investment, but favors phenotypically plastic reproductive strategies with males and females adaptively responding to variation in fitness-limiting resource availability. Under this hypothesis, neither sex is expected to possess intrinsically superior immune function, and immunological sex differences may vary in different environments. We demonstrate that sex-specific responses to experimental manipulation of fitness-limiting resources affects both the magnitude and direction of sex differences in immune function in Drosophila melanogaster. In the absence of sexual interactions and given abundant food, the immune function of adults was maximized in both sexes and there was no sex difference. Manipulation of food availability and sexual activity resulted in female-biased immune suppression when food was limited, and male-biased immune suppression when sexual activity was high and food was abundant. The immunological cost to males of increased sexual activity was found to be due in part to reduced time spent feeding. We suggest that for species similarly limited in their reproduction, phenotypic plasticity will be an important determinant of sex differences in immune function and other life-history traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16153036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  57 in total

1.  Men Have a Stronger Monocyte-Derived Cytokine Production Response upon Stimulation with the Gram-Negative Stimulus Lipopolysaccharide than Women: A Pooled Analysis Including 15 Study Populations.

Authors:  Karel G M Beenakker; Rudi G J Westendorp; Anton J M de Craen; Sijia Chen; Yotam Raz; Bart E P B Ballieux; Rob G H H Nelissen; Alexander F L Later; Tom W Huizinga; Pieternella E Slagboom; Dorret I Boomsma; Andrea B Maier
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 7.349

2.  Free-living pathogens: life-history constraints and strain competition.

Authors:  Thomas Caraco; Ing-Nang Wang
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Sex-specific variation in the emphasis, inducibility and timing of the post-mating immune response in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Wade E Winterhalter; Kenneth M Fedorka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection.

Authors:  N P Sharp; C M Vincent
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  X-linked variation in immune response in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Erin M Hill-Burns; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Sex-dependent immune response in a semelparous spider.

Authors:  Zoltán Rádai; Zoltán Németh; Zoltán Barta
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-06-07

7.  The role of anorexia in resistance and tolerance to infections in Drosophila.

Authors:  Janelle S Ayres; David S Schneider
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Sexual antagonism for resistance and tolerance to infection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Crystal M Vincent; Nathaniel P Sharp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The transcriptional response of Drosophila melanogaster to infection with the sigma virus (Rhabdoviridae).

Authors:  Jennifer Carpenter; Stephan Hutter; John F Baines; Julia Roller; Sarah S Saminadin-Peter; John Parsch; Francis M Jiggins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genotype and gene expression associations with immune function in Drosophila.

Authors:  Timothy B Sackton; Brian P Lazzaro; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.