Literature DB >> 16151838

Skinfold thickness versus isotope dilution for body fat assessment during simulated microgravity: results from three bed-rest campaigns in men and women with and without countermeasures.

Alexandre Zahariev1, Audrey Bergouignan, Michel Caloin, Sylvie Normand, Guillemette Gauquelin-Koch, Claude Gharib, Stéphane Blanc.   

Abstract

Because body composition is altered during head-down bed rest (HDBR), body mass can not be used as an index of energy balance. Consequently diet allowances should not be based on body mass evolution but on fat mass changes. Though criticized, skinfold thickness (ST) is the costless, easiest and fastest method to use for such an objective. The aim of this study was to compare the percentage of body fat (%BF) estimated by ST with the isotope dilution of H2 18O. We compiled data from three HDBR campaigns, one on women (n=8) in November 1998 and two on the same men (n=8) in December 1997 (without countermeasure) and January 1998 (with thigh-cuffs countermeasure), according to a crossover design. Body composition was assessed before and after 6 days of HDBR. %BF was derived from the biceps, triceps, sub-scapular and sup-iliac ST according to Durnin and Wormersly (1974). Fat-free mass was measured on the same day by H2 18O dilution and fat mass was calculated by the difference with body mass and expressed as a percentage. Based on precision tests, the minimum measurable change by ST was 1.1%BF for single measurement point. Both intercepts (F (4,30)=0.89, P=0.45) and slopes (F (4,30)=0.74; P=0.57) of the ST versus dilution relationships were not affected by the periods (December vs January), experimental conditions (control vs HDBR vs HDBR + thigh cuffs) or sex allowing the derivation of a common relationship %BF(st)=0.94 x %BF(dil) (F (1,47)=97.9, P<0.0001; non-significant intercept excluded) with a bias between methods of -1.7+/-2.0 %BF (95% CI: -5.8, 2.4 %BF). ST can be used to measure %BF during HDBR provided great care is placed on training and changes are higher than 1.1 %BF. If the method can be applied for in-flight energy balance monitoring given the high observed energy deficit, a tight monitoring of the individual nutritional status as needed during simulation appears, however, dubious based on this solely method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16151838     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-005-0021-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  17 in total

1.  Energy expenditure and balance during spaceflight on the space shuttle.

Authors:  T P Stein; M J Leskiw; M D Schluter; R W Hoyt; H W Lane; R E Gretebeck; A D LeBlanc
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Comparison of body composition methods: a literature analysis.

Authors:  M Fogelholm; W van Marken Lichtenbelt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Adaptations to a 7-day head-down bed rest with thigh cuffs.

Authors:  C Millet; M A Custaud; A M Allevard; C Gharib; G Gauquelin-Koch; J O Fortrat
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Validity of six field and laboratory methods for measurement of body composition in boys.

Authors:  Lisa Parker; John J Reilly; Christine Slater; Jonathan C K Wells; Yannis Pitsiladis
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-07

5.  Energy absorption, lean body mass, and total body fat changes during 5 weeks of continuous bed rest.

Authors:  J M Krebs; V S Schneider; H Evans; M C Kuo; A D LeBlanc
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1990-04

6.  The relationship between dietary intake, exercise, energy balance and the space craft environment.

Authors:  T P Stein
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.657

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. 1961.

Authors:  W E Siri
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

9.  Energy expenditure during antiorthostatic bed rest (simulated microgravity).

Authors:  R J Gretebeck; D A Schoeller; E K Gibson; H W Lane
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1995-06

10.  Measurement of nutritional status in simulated microgravity by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Cynthia Bartok; Richard L Atkinson; Dale A Schoeller
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-01-31
View more
  2 in total

1.  Bed rest and resistive vibration exercise unveil novel links between skeletal muscle mitochondrial function and insulin resistance.

Authors:  Helena C Kenny; Floriane Rudwill; Laura Breen; Michele Salanova; Dieter Blottner; Tim Heise; Martina Heer; Stephane Blanc; Donal J O'Gorman
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 2.  Accounting for the Nutritional Context to Correctly Interpret Results from Studies of Exercise and Sedentary Behavior.

Authors:  Barry Braun; Alissa Newman
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.