Literature DB >> 16150894

The time and spatial effects of bystander response in mammalian cells induced by low dose radiation.

Burong Hu1, Lijun Wu, Wei Han, Leilei Zhang, Shaopeng Chen, An Xu, Tom K Hei, Zengliang Yu.   

Abstract

Bystander effects induced by low dose of ionizing radiation have been shown to widely exist in many cell types and may have a significant impact on radiation risk assessment. Though many studies have been reported on this phenomenological observation, the mechanisms underlying this process are not clear, especially on the questions of how soon after irradiation the bystander effects can be initiated and how far this bystander signal can be propagated once it is started. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by ionizing radiation or carcinogenic chemicals can be visualized in situ using gamma-H2AX immunofluorescent staining. Our previous studies have shown that in situ visualization of DSBs could be used to assess irradiation-induced extranuclear/extracellular (bystander) effect at an early stage after irradiation. In the present studies, we used this method to investigate the time and spatial effects of damage signals on unirradiated bystander cells. The results showed that increased DSBs in irradiated and unirradiated bystander areas could be visualized 2 min after radiation and reached its maximum 30 min after radiation. The average levels of DSB formation at 30 min post-1cGy irradiation in the irradiated and unirradiated bystander areas were 3-fold and 2-fold higher than those of the sham-irradiated control cells, respectively. Afterwards, the formation of DSBs declined with incubation time and remained steady for at least 6 h at a level that was statistically higher than their controls. The results also showed that the bystander signal derived from irradiated cells could be transferred to anywhere in the dish and the percentage of DSBs in the unirradiated bystander cells was not dependent on the dose delivered. Moreover, the fraction of DSB positive cells in unirradiated bystander areas showed a time-dependent increase based on its distance to the irradiated area at very early stage post-irradiation. Both lindane and DMSO significantly suppressed the yield of DSBs in the cells of unirradiated bystander areas, which suggest that gap junctional intercellular communication and reactive oxygen species played important roles in the induction of the bystander effects, both in irradiated and unirradiated bystander areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16150894     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  41 in total

Review 1.  Double-strand breaks and the concept of short- and long-term epigenetic memory.

Authors:  Christian Orlowski; Li-Jeen Mah; Raja S Vasireddy; Assam El-Osta; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Demonstration of a radiation-induced bystander effect for low dose low LET beta-particles.

Authors:  Rudranath Persaud; Hongning Zhou; Tom K Hei; Eric J Hall
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Microchamber arrays for the identification of individual cells exposed to an X-ray microbeam.

Authors:  Takahiro Kuchimaru; Fuminobu Sato; Yusuke Aoi; Tomohisa Fujita; Toshiji Ikeda; Kikuo Shimizu; Yushi Kato; Toshiyuki Iida
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Does the number of irradiated cells influence the spatial distribution of bystander effects?

Authors:  A Belchior; I Balásházy; O Monteiro Gil; P Vaz; P Almeida
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  A reaction-diffusion model for radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Oluwole Olobatuyi; Gerda de Vries; Thomas Hillen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Microbeam radiation therapy alters vascular architecture and tumor oxygenation and is enhanced by a galectin-1 targeted anti-angiogenic peptide.

Authors:  Robert J Griffin; Nathan A Koonce; Ruud P M Dings; Eric Siegel; Eduardo G Moros; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Peter M Corry
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Oxidative DNA damage caused by inflammation may link to stress-induced non-targeted effects.

Authors:  Carl N Sprung; Alesia Ivashkevich; Helen B Forrester; Christophe E Redon; Alexandros Georgakilas; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  MiR-663 inhibits radiation-induced bystander effects by targeting TGFB1 in a feedback mode.

Authors:  Wentao Hu; Shuai Xu; Bin Yao; Mei Hong; Xin Wu; Hailong Pei; Lei Chang; Nan Ding; Xiaofei Gao; Caiyong Ye; Jufang Wang; Tom K Hei; Guangming Zhou
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 9.  New molecular targets in radiotherapy: DNA damage signalling and repair in targeted and non-targeted cells.

Authors:  Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.432

10.  Regulation of early signaling and gene expression in the alpha-particle and bystander response of IMR-90 human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Shanaz A Ghandhi; Lihua Ming; Vladimir N Ivanov; Tom K Hei; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.