Literature DB >> 16150399

The role of biomarkers in the assessment of lupus.

Joan T Merrill1, Jill P Buyon.   

Abstract

Although considered a prototypic autoimmune disease, the hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is its heterogeneity. Accordingly, manifestations can vary widely from person to person, with the potential involvement of virtually any bodily organ. Furthermore, the genetic abnormalities underlying this condition are complicated, with diverse genetic polymorphisms described in different ethnic groups, strongly suggesting that the actual pathology underlying the immunologic disarray might not be the same for each patient. Evolving concepts of genetics and immunity have clarified that patients can carry unique arrays of exacerbating and protective factors. These factors, in conjunction with variable environmental triggers for SLE, probably determine the sequelae that an individual experiences. Therefore, it is not surprising that the clinical manifestations are diverse, the temporal sequence of organ involvement often unpredictable, and that the flares of inflammatory activity that characterize SLE can either remit without consequence or leave permanent damage in their wake. It is widely accepted that the current standard of care for SLE patients is inadequate. Programs to develop and test new drug and/or device therapies have been ongoing since the mid-1990s but have encountered formidable obstacles. With the current burst of drug discovery and the advent of several large international trials of promising new agents, the challenge to overcome these obstacles has never been greater. A burgeoning literature in the past decades nevertheless suggests that despite the complexities of the many immunologic pathways that impact on SLE, characteristic biologic markers are emerging as potential signposts that can characterize patient subgroups, predict prognosis, mark the exacerbations and remissions of SLE flares, and serve as endpoints in the determination of the dosing and timing of immune-modulating treatments. Several of the promising biomarkers are addressed in this chapter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16150399     DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1521-6942            Impact factor:   4.098


  9 in total

1.  Markers of childhood lupus nephritis indicating disease activity.

Authors:  Monika Edelbauer; Sudhir Kshirsagar; Magdalena Riedl; Dieter Haffner; Heiko Billing; Burkhard Tönshoff; Sophia Ross; Jörg Dötsch; Oliver Amon; Henry Fehrenbach; Christian Steuber; Antje Beissert; Josef Hager; Gottfried Wechselberger; Lutz T Weber; Lothar Bernd Zimmerhackl
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Urinary interleukin 22 binding protein as a marker of lupus nephritis in Egyptian children with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohamed Mahmoud Badr; Yomna Farag; Maie Abdelshafy; Nermine Magdi Riad
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: high disease activity predictors of response.

Authors:  Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Michelle A Petri; Ricard Cervera; David A Roth; Beulah N Ji; Christi S Kleoudis; Z John Zhong; William Freimuth
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Serum Beta 2-microglobulin/cystatin C index: a useful biomarker in lupus nephritis?

Authors:  Marcus Vinicius Madureira Silva; Grace T Moscoso-Solorzano; Sonia K Nishida; Gianna Mastroianni-Kirsztajn
Journal:  Nephron Extra       Date:  2012-06-22

5.  Clinical, laboratory and health-related quality of life correlates of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index response: a post hoc analysis of the phase 3 belimumab trials.

Authors:  Richard Furie; Michelle A Petri; Vibeke Strand; Dafna D Gladman; Z John Zhong; William W Freimuth
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2014-06-26

6.  Clinical response beyond the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index: post-hoc analysis of the BLISS-SC study.

Authors:  Ronald F van Vollenhoven; William Stohl; Richard A Furie; Norma Lynn Fox; James G Groark; Damon Bass; Milena Kurtinecz; Bonnie F Pobiner; William J Eastman; Tania Gonzalez-Rivera; David Gordon
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2018-11-26

7.  Galectin-9 as a biomarker for disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Naoki Matsuoka; Yuya Fujita; Jumpei Temmoku; Makiko Yashiro Furuya; Tomoyuki Asano; Shuzo Sato; Haruki Matsumoto; Hiroko Kobayashi; Hiroshi Watanabe; Eiji Suzuki; Hideko Kozuru; Hiroshi Yastuhashi; Kiyoshi Migita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Diagnostic reliability of magnetic resonance imaging for central nervous system syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Katsumata; Masayoshi Harigai; Yasushi Kawaguchi; Chikako Fukasawa; Makoto Soejima; Tokiko Kanno; Katsuji Nishimura; Takayuki Yamada; Hisashi Yamanaka; Masako Hara
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Mechanistic target of rapamycin activation triggers IL-4 production and necrotic death of double-negative T cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Zhi-Wei Lai; Rebecca Borsuk; Ashwini Shadakshari; Jianghong Yu; Maha Dawood; Ricardo Garcia; Lisa Francis; Hajra Tily; Adam Bartos; Stephen V Faraone; Paul Phillips; Andras Perl
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 5.422

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.