BACKGROUND: The Women's Health Trial (WHT) was a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial designed to test the hypothesis that a reduction in dietary fat reduces breast cancer incidence among women age 45 to 69. Between 1984 and 1988, 2,064 women participated in its two phases. METHODS: A follow-up study of 525 women who were randomized to receive the WHT dietary intervention program was conducted to assess maintenance of the diet 1 year on average after the trial ended. Among 448 participants, the mean percentage of energy from fat as measured by a food frequency questionnaire was 40.0% at baseline, 26.3% at the end of the trial, and 27.7% at follow-up. Based on 408 women with complete data, a recursive model was estimated, describing the influence of baseline characteristics of the women on attendance at intervention program sessions, adherence to the diet during the trial, and long-term maintenance of the diet after the trial ended. The effects of women's experiences during the trial on adherence and long-term maintenance were investigated as well. RESULTS: Attendance at the educational sessions was strongly related to adherence to the diet during the trial (P less than 0.001), and adherence was the most important predictor of long-term maintenance (P less than 0.001). The percentage of energy from dietary fat at baseline was an important correlate of both adherence (P less than 0.001) and long-term maintenance (P less than 0.001). College-educated women were more likely to adhere to the diet during the trial (P less than 0.001). Feelings of deprivation adversely affected long-term maintenance (P less than 0.01), primarily through their effect on adherence during the trial (P = 0.01). Costliness of the diet in time and money negatively influenced long-term maintenance (P less than 0.05). Development of a distaste for fat encouraged adherence (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The low-fat dietary pattern established during the WHT was maintained for as long as 20 months after the trial ended. A recursive model was useful in analyzing the process and correlates of long-term maintenance of dietary behavior change. Both predisposing variables and women's experiences while on a low-fat diet were associated with long-term maintenance. The results suggest that feelings of deprivation should be avoided, perhaps by use of low-fat substitutes, by those attempting to lower their dietary fat and that more research is needed on the development of a distaste for fat among individuals who adopt low-fat diets.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Women's Health Trial (WHT) was a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial designed to test the hypothesis that a reduction in dietary fat reduces breast cancer incidence among women age 45 to 69. Between 1984 and 1988, 2,064 women participated in its two phases. METHODS: A follow-up study of 525 women who were randomized to receive the WHT dietary intervention program was conducted to assess maintenance of the diet 1 year on average after the trial ended. Among 448 participants, the mean percentage of energy from fat as measured by a food frequency questionnaire was 40.0% at baseline, 26.3% at the end of the trial, and 27.7% at follow-up. Based on 408 women with complete data, a recursive model was estimated, describing the influence of baseline characteristics of the women on attendance at intervention program sessions, adherence to the diet during the trial, and long-term maintenance of the diet after the trial ended. The effects of women's experiences during the trial on adherence and long-term maintenance were investigated as well. RESULTS: Attendance at the educational sessions was strongly related to adherence to the diet during the trial (P less than 0.001), and adherence was the most important predictor of long-term maintenance (P less than 0.001). The percentage of energy from dietary fat at baseline was an important correlate of both adherence (P less than 0.001) and long-term maintenance (P less than 0.001). College-educated women were more likely to adhere to the diet during the trial (P less than 0.001). Feelings of deprivation adversely affected long-term maintenance (P less than 0.01), primarily through their effect on adherence during the trial (P = 0.01). Costliness of the diet in time and money negatively influenced long-term maintenance (P less than 0.05). Development of a distaste for fat encouraged adherence (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The low-fat dietary pattern established during the WHT was maintained for as long as 20 months after the trial ended. A recursive model was useful in analyzing the process and correlates of long-term maintenance of dietary behavior change. Both predisposing variables and women's experiences while on a low-fat diet were associated with long-term maintenance. The results suggest that feelings of deprivation should be avoided, perhaps by use of low-fat substitutes, by those attempting to lower their dietary fat and that more research is needed on the development of a distaste for fat among individuals who adopt low-fat diets.
Authors: Lora E Burke; Mindi A Styn; Karen Glanz; Linda J Ewing; Okan U Elci; Margaret B Conroy; Susan M Sereika; Sushama D Acharya; Edvin Music; Alison L Keating; Mary Ann Sevick Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Alexandra Feathers; Ana C Aycinena; Gina S Lovasi; Andrew Rundle; Ann Ogden Gaffney; John Richardson; Dawn Hershman; Pam Koch; Isobel Contento; Heather Greenlee Journal: Nutr Res Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Lisa Madlensky; Loki Natarajan; Shirley W Flatt; Susan Faerber; Vicky A Newman; John P Pierce Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: H J Sutherland; K Carlin; W Harper; L J Martin; C V Greenberg; J E Till; N F Boyd Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Frank M Sacks; George A Bray; Vincent J Carey; Steven R Smith; Donna H Ryan; Stephen D Anton; Katherine McManus; Catherine M Champagne; Louise M Bishop; Nancy Laranjo; Meryl S Leboff; Jennifer C Rood; Lilian de Jonge; Frank L Greenway; Catherine M Loria; Eva Obarzanek; Donald A Williamson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 91.245