Literature DB >> 16148213

Marketing genetic tests: empowerment or snake oil?

Deborah J Bowen1, Kathryn M Battuello, Monique Raats.   

Abstract

Genetic tests are currently being offered to the general public with little oversight and regulation as to which tests are allowed to be sold clinically and little control over the marketing and promotion of sales and use. This article provides discussion and data to indicate that the general public holds high opinions of genetic testing and that current media outlets for public education on genetic testing are not adequate to increase accurate knowledge of genetics. The authors argue that more regulation is needed to control and correct this problem in the United States.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16148213     DOI: 10.1177/1090198105278825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  10 in total

1.  Direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: a case study and practical recommendations for “genomic counseling”.

Authors:  Amy C Sturm; Kandamurugu Manickam
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests among members of a large managed care organization.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Nicole Wagner; Anh Quynh Le; Eve Halterman; Nadine Cornish; James W Dearing
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006.

Authors:  Katrina A B Goddard; Debra Duquette; Amy Zlot; Jenny Johnson; Ann Annis-Emeott; Patrick W Lee; Mary Pat Bland; Karen L Edwards; Kristin Oehlke; Rebecca T Giles; Ann Rafferty; Michelle L Cook; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Informed Choice in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Alzheimer and Other Diseases: Lessons from Two Cases.

Authors:  Donna A Messner
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2011

5.  Factors associated with genetic counseling and BRCA testing in a population-based sample of young Black women with breast cancer.

Authors:  D Cragun; D Bonner; J Kim; M R Akbari; S A Narod; A Gomez-Fuego; J D Garcia; S T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Genetics, genomics, and cancer risk assessment: State of the Art and Future Directions in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Public health genomics and genetic test evaluation: the challenge of conducting behavioural research on the utility of lifestyle-genetic tests.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2008-08-06

8.  Conceptions on genetics in a group of college students.

Authors:  Patrícia Santana Correia; Pedro Vitiello; Maria Helena Cabral de Almeida Cardoso; Dafne Dain Gandelman Horovitz
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-11-01

Review 9.  Personal genome testing: test characteristics to clarify the discourse on ethical, legal and societal issues.

Authors:  Eline M Bunnik; Maartje H N Schermer; A Cecile J W Janssens
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Misuse (and abuse?) of the Concept of Empowerment.The Case of Online Offer of Predictive Direct-to-consumer Genetic Tests.

Authors:  Loredana Covolo; Sara Rubinelli; Grazia Orizio; Umberto Gelatti
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2012-02-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.