Literature DB >> 16147474

Facilitating EMS turnaround intervals at hospitals in the face of receiving facility overcrowding.

Marc Eckstein1, S Marshal Isaacs, Corey M Slovis, Bradley J Kaufman, James R Loflin, Robert E O'Connor, Paul E Pepe.   

Abstract

The escalating national problem of oversaturated hospital beds and emergency departments (EDs) has resulted in serious operational impediments within patient-receiving facilities. It has also had a growing impact on the 9-1-1 emergency care system. Beyond the long-standing difficulties arising from ambulance diversion practices, many emergency medical services (EMS) crews are now finding themselves detained in EDs for protracted periods, unable to transfer care of their transported patients to ED staff members. Key factors have included a lack of beds or stretcher space, and, in some cases, EMS personnel are used transiently for ED patient care services. In other circumstances, ED staff members no longer prioritize rapid turnaround of EMS-transported patients because of the increasing volume and acuity of patients already in their care. The resulting detention of EMS crews confounds concurrent ambulance availability problems, creates concrete risks for delayed EMS responses to impending critical cases, and incurs regulatory jeopardy for hospitals. Communities should take appropriate steps to ensure that delivery intervals (time elapsing from entry into the hospital to physical transfer of patient care to ED staff) remain extremely brief (less than a few minutes) and that they rarely exceed 10 minutes. While recognizing that the root causes of these issues will require far-reaching national health care policy changes, EMS and local government officials should still maintain ongoing dialogues with hospital chief administrators to mitigate this mutual crisis of escalating service demands. Federal and state health officials should also play an active role in monitoring progress and compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16147474     DOI: 10.1080/10903120590962102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  6 in total

1.  The application of forecasting techniques to modeling emergency medical system calls in Calgary, Alberta.

Authors:  Nabil Channouf; Pierre L'Ecuyer; Armann Ingolfsson; Athanassios N Avramidis
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2007-02

Review 2.  A review on ambulance offload delay literature.

Authors:  Mengyu Li; Peter Vanberkel; Alix J E Carter
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2018-07-07

3.  Machine learning-based forecasting of firemen ambulances' turnaround time in hospitals, considering the COVID-19 impact.

Authors:  Selene Cerna; Héber H Arcolezi; Christophe Guyeux; Guillaume Royer-Fey; Céline Chevallier
Journal:  Appl Soft Comput       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Response time as a sole performance indicator in EMS: Pitfalls and solutions.

Authors:  Sultan Zayed Khalifah Al-Shaqsi
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2010-01-08

5.  Impacts of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident on emergency medical service times in Soma District, Japan: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Tomohiro Morita; Masaharu Tsubokura; Tomoyuki Furutani; Shuhei Nomura; Sae Ochi; Claire Leppold; Kazuhiro Takahara; Yuki Shimada; Sho Fujioka; Masahiro Kami; Shigeaki Kato; Tomoyoshi Oikawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Workplace Violence in Asian Emergency Medical Services: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pei-Yu Wang; Pin-Hui Fang; Chen-Long Wu; Hsiang-Chin Hsu; Chih-Hao Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.