Literature DB >> 16145392

The prostatic specific antigen era is alive and well: prostatic specific antigen and biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy.

Stephen J Freedland1, Leslie A Mangold, Patrick C Walsh, Alan W Partin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to predict the presence of prostate cancer on biopsy, pathological stage, and biochemical progression following primary therapy. A recent study found only a weak association between PSA and tumor volume in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen and concluded that the PSA era is over. We examined the association between PSA and clinical progression in men undergoing RP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 2,312 men treated with RP between 1992 and 2004 by a single surgeon. We evaluated the association between preoperative PSA and biochemical progression on multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Men with higher preoperative PSA concentrations had higher grade cancers in the biopsy and RP specimen, and more adverse pathological features. After adjusting for the clinical covariates of age, race, grade, stage, and year of surgery, preoperative PSA was significantly associated with the risk of biochemical progression. When only men with PSA less than 10 ng/ml were examined, PSA remained a significant predictor of biochemical progression on multivariate analysis (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.44, p <0.001). For each 2-point increase in PSA, the risk of biochemical progression increased approximately 2-fold.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PSA was significantly associated with high grade disease and adverse pathological findings. After adjusting for clinical covariates, PSA was significantly associated with the risk of biochemical progression, even in men with PSA less than 10 ng/ml. Despite multiple limitations, PSA remains the best prostate cancer tumor marker available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16145392     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173907.84852.ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

1.  Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla to assess local recurrence following radical prostatectomy using T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced imaging.

Authors:  Stefano Cirillo; Massimo Petracchini; Lorenza Scotti; Teresa Gallo; Annalisa Macera; Maria Cristina Bona; Cinzia Ortega; Pietro Gabriele; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial of the Action of Several Doses of Lycopene in Localized Prostate Cancer: Administration Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nagi B Kumar; Karen Besterman-Dahan; Loveleen Kang; Julio Pow-Sang; Ping Xu; Kathy Allen; Diane Riccardi; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Clin Med Urol       Date:  2008-04-16

Review 3.  [How to use PSA in 2009].

Authors:  Anton Ponholzer; Franz Stoiber; Wolfgang Loidl; Michael Rauchenwald; Paul Schramek; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009

4.  Results of a randomized phase I dose-finding trial of several doses of isoflavones in men with localized prostate cancer: administration prior to radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nagi B Kumar; Loveleen Kang; Julio Pow-Sang; Ping Xu; Kathy Allen; Diane Riccardi; Karen Besterman-Dahan; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  J Soc Integr Oncol       Date:  2010

5.  Comparison of oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer with PSA levels below and above 4 ng/mL.

Authors:  Charles Dariane; Chloé Le Cossec; Sarah J Drouin; Benoit Wolff; Benjamin Granger; Pierre Mozer; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Shahrokh F Shariat; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Long-term assessment of prostate cancer progression free survival: evaluation of pathological parameters, nuclear shape and molecular biomarkers of pathogenesis.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Sumit Isharwal; M Craig Miller; Jonathan I Epstein; Leslie A Mangold; Elizabeth Humphreys; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Prostate cancer mortality following active surveillance versus immediate radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Bruce J Trock; Matthew R Cooperberg; Roman Gulati; Steven B Zeliadt; John L Gore; Daniel W Lin; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Oncologic outcome after radical prostatectomy in men with PSA values above 20 ng/ml: a monocentric experience.

Authors:  Kien Nguyen; Stephanie Eltz; Sarah J Drouin; Eva Comperat; François Audenet; Raphaele Renard-Penna; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; François Richard; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Practice patterns of Korean urologists for screening and managing prostate cancer according to PSA level.

Authors:  Mun Su Chung; Seung Hwan Lee; Dong Hoon Lee; Se Joong Kim; Choung Soo Kim; Kyu Sung Lee; Jae Il Jung; Sae Woong Kim; Yil Seob Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Radical Prostatectomy as a First-Line Treatment in Patients with Initial PSA  >20 ng/mL.

Authors:  Alexander I Hinev; Deyan Anakievski; Vesselin I Hadjiev
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.