Literature DB >> 16144908

Translational crossroads for biomarkers.

Robert C Bast1, Hans Lilja, Nicole Urban, David L Rimm, Herbert Fritsche, Joe Gray, Robert Veltri, George Klee, Andrew Allen, Nam Kim, Steven Gutman, Mark A Rubin, Andrew Hruszkewycz.   

Abstract

A group of investigators met at a Specialized Programs of Research Excellence Workshop to discuss key issues in the translation of biomarker discovery to the development of useful laboratory tests for cancer care. Development and approval of several new markers and technologies have provided informative examples that include more specific markers for prostate cancer, more sensitive tests for ovarian cancer, more objective analysis of tissue architecture and an earlier indication of response to treatment in breast cancer. Although there is no clear paradigm for biomarker development, several principles are clear. Marker development should be driven by clinical needs, including early cancer detection, accurate pretreatment staging, and prediction of response to treatment, as well as monitoring disease progression and response to therapy. Development of a national repository that uses carefully preserved, well-annotated tissue specimens will facilitate new marker development. Reference standards will be an essential component of this process. Both hospital-based and commercial laboratories can play a role in developing biomarkers from discovery to test validation. Partnering of academe and industry should occur throughout the process of biomarker development. The National Cancer Institute is in a unique position to bring together academe, industry, and the Food and Drug Administration to (a) define clinical needs for biomarkers by tumor type, (b) establish analytic and clinical paradigms for biomarker development, (c) discuss ways in which markers from different companies might be evaluated in combination, (d) establish computational methods to combine data from multiple biomarkers, (e) share information regarding promising markers developed in National Cancer Institute-supported programs, and (f) exchange data regarding new platforms and techniques that can accelerate marker development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16144908     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  30 in total

Review 1.  Biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  J Cummings; T H Ward; A Greystoke; M Ranson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Combining multiple biomarker models in logistic regression.

Authors:  Zheng Yuan; Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers - Needs, Present Status, and Future Promise.

Authors:  Hua Zhou; Stephen M Hewitt; Peter S T Yuen; Robert A Star
Journal:  Nephrol Self Assess Program       Date:  2006-03

Review 4.  Immunohistochemistry in diagnostic surgical pathology: contributions of protein life-cycle, use of evidence-based methods and data normalization on interpretation of immunohistochemical stains.

Authors:  Halliday A Idikio
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-11-25

5.  Quantitative analysis of p53 expression in human normal and cancer tissue microarray with global normalization method.

Authors:  Halliday A Idikio
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2011-06-15

6.  Micro-NMR for rapid molecular analysis of human tumor samples.

Authors:  Jered B Haun; Cesar M Castro; Rui Wang; Vanessa M Peterson; Brett S Marinelli; Hakho Lee; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis.

Authors:  Marina Gándara-Cortes; Ángel Vázquez-Boquete; Beatriz Fernández-Rodríguez; Patricia Viaño; Dora Ínsua; Alejandro Seoane-Seoane; Francisco Gude; Rosalía Gallego; Máximo Fraga; José R Antúnez; Teresa Curiel; Eva Pérez-López; Tomás García-Caballero
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Diversity in specificity, abundance, and composition of anti-Neu5Gc antibodies in normal humans: potential implications for disease.

Authors:  Vered Padler-Karavani; Hai Yu; Hongzhi Cao; Harshal Chokhawala; Felix Karp; Nissi Varki; Xi Chen; Ajit Varki
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 4.313

9.  Issues on fit-for-purpose validation of a panel of ELISAs for application as biomarkers in clinical trials of anti-Angiogenic drugs.

Authors:  K Brookes; J Cummings; A Backen; A Greystoke; T Ward; G C Jayson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Comparison of digital image analysis versus visual assessment to assess survivin expression as an independent predictor of survival for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexander S Parker; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; John C Cheville; Yuri M Sheinin; Eugene D Kwon
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 3.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.