Literature DB >> 16143674

Considering multiple criteria for social categorization can reduce intergroup bias.

Natalie R Hall1, Richard J Crisp.   

Abstract

Two experiments tested the notion that considering multiple criteria for social categorization can reduce intergroup bias. In both experiments, participants were required to consider alternative ways in which people could be classified, other than an initially salient intergroup dichotomy. In Experiment 1, the authors found that generating alternative social classifications that were unrelated to an initial target dichotomy reduced intergroup bias compared to a control condition. In Experiment 2, this effect was replicated and the authors found that unrelated, but not related, categorizations were necessary to reduce bias. This article adds support to the view that increasing categorical complexity is a useful tool in bias reduction. These findings are discussed in the context of a developing model of multiple categorization effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16143674     DOI: 10.1177/0146167205276084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  4 in total

1.  Criterial noise effects on rule-based category learning: the impact of delayed feedback.

Authors:  Shawn W Ell; A David Ing; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Humanizing Outgroups Through Multiple Categorization: The Roles of Individuation and Threat.

Authors:  Francesca Prati; Richard J Crisp; Rose Meleady; Monica Rubini
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-04

Review 3.  Discrimination against childbearing Romani women in maternity care in Europe: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Helen L Watson; Soo Downe
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Tolerance by surprise: evidence for a generalized reduction in prejudice and increased egalitarianism through novel category combination.

Authors:  Milica Vasiljevic; Richard J Crisp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.