Literature DB >> 16143414

Body sway during quiet standing: is it the residual chattering of an intermittent stabilization process?

Alessandra Bottaro1, Maura Casadio, Pietro G Morasso, Vittorio Sanguineti.   

Abstract

This paper reviews different approaches for explaining body sway while quiet standing that directly address the instability of the human inverted pendulum. We argue that both stiffness control [Winter, D. A., Patla, A. E., Riedtyk, S., & Ishac, M. (2001). Ankle muscle stiffness in the control of balance during quiet standing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 2630-2633] and continuous feedback control by means of a PID (Proportional, Integral, Derivative) mechanism [Peterka, R. J. (2000). Postural control model interpretation of stabilogram diffusion analysis. Biological Cybernetics, 83, 335-343.] can guarantee asymptotic stability of controlled posture at the expense of unrealistic assumptions: the level of intrinsic muscle stiffness in the former case, and the level of background noise in the latter, which also determines an unrealistic level of jerkiness in the sway. We show that the decomposition of the control action into a slow and a fast component (rambling and trembling, respectively, as proposed by [Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Duarte, M. (1999). Instant equilibrium point and its migration in standing tasks: Rambling and trembling components of the stabilogram. Motor Control, 4, 185-200; Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Duarte, M. (2000). Rambling and trembling in quiet standing. Motor Control, 4, 185-200.]) is useful but must be modified in order to take into account that rambling is not a stable equilibrium trajectory. We address the possibility of a form of stability weaker than asymptotic stability in light of the intermittent stabilization mechanism outlined by [Loram, I. D., & Lakie, M. (2002a). Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: position control by small, ballistic-like, throw and catch movements. Journal of Physiology, 540, 1111-1124.], and propose an indicator of intermittent stabilization that is related to the phase portrait of the human inverted pendulum. This indicator provides a further argument against the plausibility of PID-like control mechanisms. Finally, we draw attention to the sliding mode control theory that provides a useful theoretical framework for formulating realistic intermittent, stabilization models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16143414     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  44 in total

1.  Detecting dynamical boundaries from kinematic data in biomechanics.

Authors:  Shane D Ross; Martin L Tanaka; Carmine Senatore
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.642

2.  Body-worn motion sensors detect balance and gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis who have normal walking speed.

Authors:  R I Spain; R J St George; A Salarian; M Mancini; J M Wagner; F B Horak; D Bourdette
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Process stationarity and reliability of trunk postural stability.

Authors:  HyunWook Lee; Kevin P Granata
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Balance control under different passive contributions of the ankle extensors: quiet standing on inclined surfaces.

Authors:  Shun Sasagawa; Junichi Ushiyama; Kei Masani; Motoki Kouzaki; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual control of stable and unstable loads: what is the feedback delay and extent of linear time-invariant control?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Modelling human balance using switched systems with linear feedback control.

Authors:  Piotr Kowalczyk; Paul Glendinning; Martin Brown; Gustavo Medrano-Cerda; Houman Dallali; Jonathan Shapiro
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  A new paradigm for human stick balancing: a suspended not an inverted pendulum.

Authors:  Kwee-Yum Lee; Nicholas O'Dwyer; Mark Halaki; Richard Smith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Double-well dynamics of noise-driven control activation in human intermittent control: the case of stick balancing.

Authors:  Arkady Zgonnikov; Ihor Lubashevsky
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-05-01

9.  A phase-locked loop model of the response of the postural control system to periodic platform motion.

Authors:  Robert J Schilling; Charles J Robinson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  A model of postural control in quiet standing: robust compensation of delay-induced instability using intermittent activation of feedback control.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Asai; Yuichi Tasaka; Kunihiko Nomura; Taishin Nomura; Maura Casadio; Pietro Morasso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.