PURPOSE: To study the effect of birth parameters, including birth weight, birth length, and birth head circumference on ocular dimensions in 6-year-old children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A stratified random cluster sample of 6-year-old Sydney school-students (n = 1765) were participants in this study. Children had ocular dimensions measured with non-contact methods (Zeiss IOLMaster, Zeiss, Meditec-AG, Jena, Germany). Information on birth weight, height, and head circumference was derived from a questionnaire. RESULTS: After adjusting for cluster, age, and gender, children with birth weight <2500 g had mean axial length 22.46 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.20-22.72) and mean corneal radius 7.70 mm (CI 7.61-7.79). This compared with axial length 22.80 mm (CI 22.70-22.90) and mean corneal radius 7.85 mm (CI 7.81-7.89) for children with birth weight > or =4000 g. Axial length and corneal radius were also related to birth length and head circumference. Refraction, however, was unrelated to birth size. CONCLUSION: Birth parameters have a lasting effect on eye size but not on spherical equivalent refraction.
PURPOSE: To study the effect of birth parameters, including birth weight, birth length, and birth head circumference on ocular dimensions in 6-year-old children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A stratified random cluster sample of 6-year-old Sydney school-students (n = 1765) were participants in this study. Children had ocular dimensions measured with non-contact methods (Zeiss IOLMaster, Zeiss, Meditec-AG, Jena, Germany). Information on birth weight, height, and head circumference was derived from a questionnaire. RESULTS: After adjusting for cluster, age, and gender, children with birth weight <2500 g had mean axial length 22.46 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.20-22.72) and mean corneal radius 7.70 mm (CI 7.61-7.79). This compared with axial length 22.80 mm (CI 22.70-22.90) and mean corneal radius 7.85 mm (CI 7.81-7.89) for children with birth weight > or =4000 g. Axial length and corneal radius were also related to birth length and head circumference. Refraction, however, was unrelated to birth size. CONCLUSION: Birth parameters have a lasting effect on eye size but not on spherical equivalent refraction.
Authors: Alicja R Rudnicka; Christopher G Owen; Claire M Nightingale; Derek G Cook; Peter H Whincup Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kate Northstone; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Laura D Howe; Kate Tilling; Lavinia Paternoster; John P Kemp; George McMahon; Cathy Williams Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jan Willem L Tideman; Jan Roelof Polling; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Christopher G Owen; Emily Oken; Alicja R Rudnicka; Rita Patel; Jennifer Thompson; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Konstatin Vilchuck; Natalia Bogdanovich; Mikhail Hameza; Michael S Kramer; Richard M Martin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.799