Literature DB >> 1613793

Co-operative binding of the globular domain of histone H5 to DNA.

P H Draves1, P T Lowary, J Widom.   

Abstract

The globular domain of histone H5 (GH5) was prepared by trypsin digestion of H5 that was extracted from chicken erythrocyte nuclei with NaCl. Electron microscopy, sucrose gradient centrifugation, native agarose gel electrophoresis and equilibrium density gradient ultracentrifugation show that GH5 binds co-operatively to double-stranded DNA. The electron microscopic images suggest that the GH5-DNA complexes are very similar in structure to co-operative complexes of intact histone H1 (or its variants) with double-stranded DNA, studied previously, which have been proposed to consist of two parallel DNA double helices sandwiching a polymer of the protein. For complexes with GH5 or with intact H1, naked DNA co-sediments with the protein-DNA complexes through sucrose gradients, and DNA also appears to protrude from the ends and sides of the complexes; measurements of the protein-DNA stoichiometry in fractionated samples may not reflect the stoichiometry in the complexes. An estimate of the stoichiometry obtained from the buoyant density of fixed GH5-DNA complexes in CsCl suggests that sufficient GH5 is present in the complexes for the GH5s to be in direct contact, as required by a simple molecular mechanism for the co-operative binding. Chemical crosslinking demonstrates that GH5s are in close proximity in the complexes. In the absence of DNA, GH5-GH5 interactions are weak or non-existent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1613793     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90108-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  17 in total

1.  MeCP2 driven transcriptional repression in vitro: selectivity for methylated DNA, action at a distance and contacts with the basal transcription machinery.

Authors:  N K Kaludov; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Exploring the conformational space of chromatin fibers and their stability by numerical dynamic phase diagrams.

Authors:  René Stehr; Robert Schöpflin; Ramona Ettig; Nick Kepper; Karsten Rippe; Gero Wedemann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Differential in vivo binding dynamics of somatic and oocyte-specific linker histones in oocytes and during ES cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Matthias Becker; Antje Becker; Faiçal Miyara; Zhiming Han; Maki Kihara; David T Brown; Gordon L Hager; Keith Latham; Eli Y Adashi; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Nucleosome geometry and internucleosomal interactions control the chromatin fiber conformation.

Authors:  Nick Kepper; Dietrich Foethke; Rene Stehr; Gero Wedemann; Karsten Rippe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The effect of internucleosomal interaction on folding of the chromatin fiber.

Authors:  René Stehr; Nick Kepper; Karsten Rippe; Gero Wedemann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Structural and dynamic properties of linker histone H1 binding to DNA.

Authors:  Rolf Dootz; Adriana C Toma; Thomas Pfohl
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Identification of two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of histone H5.

Authors:  F A Goytisolo; S E Gerchman; X Yu; C Rees; V Graziano; V Ramakrishnan; J O Thomas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Histone H1 preferentially binds to superhelical DNA molecules of higher compaction.

Authors:  M Ivanchenko; J Zlatanova; K van Holde
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 9.  Role of chromatin states in transcriptional memory.

Authors:  Sharmistha Kundu; Craig L Peterson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-02-21

10.  Histone H1 subtypes differentially modulate chromatin condensation without preventing ATP-dependent remodeling by SWI/SNF or NURF.

Authors:  Jaime Clausell; Nicole Happel; Tracy K Hale; Detlef Doenecke; Miguel Beato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.