Literature DB >> 16136802

The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Jason G Mezey1, David Houle.   

Abstract

Absolute constraints are limitations on genetic variation that preclude evolutionary change in some aspect of the phenotype. Absolute constraints may reflect complete absence of variation, lack of genetic variation that extends the range of phenotypes beyond some limit, or lack of additive genetic variation. This last type of absolute constraint is bidirectional, because the mean cannot evolve to be larger or smaller. Most traits do possess genetic variation, so bidirectional absolute constraints are most likely to be detected in a multivariate context, where they would reflect combinations of traits, or dimensions in phenotype space that cannot evolve. A bidirectional absolute constraint will cause the additive genetic covariance matrix (G) to have a rank less than the number of traits studied. In this study, we estimate the rank of the G-matrix for 20 aspects of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Our best estimates of matrix rank are 20 in both sexes. Lower 95% confidence intervals of rank are 17 for females and 18 for males. We therefore find little evidence of bidirectional absolute constraints. We discuss the importance of this result for resolving the relative roles of selection and drift processes versus constraints in the evolution of wing shape in Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16136802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  59 in total

Review 1.  What can whole genome expression data tell us about the ecology and evolution of personality?

Authors:  Alison M Bell; Nadia Aubin-Horth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Phenomics: the next challenge.

Authors:  David Houle; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Stig Omholt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; J David Aguirre; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evolvability and nonevolvability of allometric slopes.

Authors:  Jon F Harrison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Independent axes of genetic variation and parallel evolutionary divergence of opercle bone shape in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Charles B Kimmel; William A Cresko; Patrick C Phillips; Bonnie Ullmann; Mark Currey; Frank von Hippel; Bjarni K Kristjánsson; Ofer Gelmond; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Neutral evolution of multiple quantitative characters: a genealogical approach.

Authors:  Cortland K Griswold; Benjamin Logsdon; Richard Gomulkiewicz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Internal and external constraints in the evolution of morphological allometries in a butterfly.

Authors:  W Anthony Frankino; Bas J Zwaan; David L Stern; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Reconciling strong stabilizing selection with the maintenance of genetic variation in a natural population of black field crickets (Teleogryllus commodus).

Authors:  John Hunt; Mark W Blows; Felix Zajitschek; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Sexual selection in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: no good genes?

Authors:  Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz; Amanda Bretman; Jarrod D Hadfield; Tom Tregenza
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.