Literature DB >> 16133340

Evaluation of performance of different surface-engineered yeast strains for direct ethanol production from raw starch.

Teik Seong Khaw1, Yoshio Katakura, Jun Koh, Akihiko Kondo, Mitsuyoshi Ueda, Suteaki Shioya.   

Abstract

Four types of cell-surface-engineered yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae displaying glucoamylase, namely, systems A, B, C, and D, were constructed to evaluate their performance in direct ethanol fermentation from raw corn starch. Systems A and B were glucoamylase-displaying nonflocculent yeast (YF237) types that secrete alpha-amylase into the culture medium and codisplay alpha-amylase on the cell surface, respectively. Systems C and D were flocculent yeast counterparts (YF207) for systems A and B, respectively. In batch fermentations, the specific ethanol production rates of systems A, B, C, and D were 0.18, 0.06, 0.06, and 0.04 g (g cell)(-1) h(-1), respectively. In repeated fermentations, the specific ethanol production rate of system A decreased with the number of repetitions, whereas, that of system B was maintained. In all systems, the rate-limiting step was the conversion of starch to oligosaccharide because oligosaccharide and glucose were not accumulated throughout the fermentations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16133340     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-005-0101-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

1.  Heterologous expression and efficient ethanol production of a Rhizopus glucoamylase gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shaohui Yang; Naibing Jia; Minggang Li; Jiehua Wang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Designing industrial yeasts for the consolidated bioprocessing of starchy biomass to ethanol.

Authors:  Lorenzo Favaro; Tania Jooste; Marina Basaglia; Shaunita H Rose; Maryna Saayman; Johann F Görgens; Sergio Casella; Willem H van Zyl
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 3.  Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Elke Nevoigt
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  One-pot bioethanol production from cellulose by co-culture of Acremonium cellulolyticus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Enoch Y Park; Kazuya Naruse; Tatsuya Kato
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain Reveals Peculiar Genomic Traits for Starch-to-Bioethanol Production: the Design of an Amylolytic Consolidated Bioprocessing Yeast.

Authors:  Nicoletta Gronchi; Nicola De Bernardini; Rosemary A Cripwell; Laura Treu; Stefano Campanaro; Marina Basaglia; Maria R Foulquié-Moreno; Johan M Thevelein; Willem H Van Zyl; Lorenzo Favaro; Sergio Casella
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Combined cell-surface display- and secretion-based strategies for production of cellulosic ethanol with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zhuo Liu; Kentaro Inokuma; Shih-Hsin Ho; Riaan den Haan; Tomohisa Hasunuma; Willem H van Zyl; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Raw starch conversion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing Aspergillus tubingensis amylases.

Authors:  Marko J Viktor; Shaunita H Rose; Willem H van Zyl; Marinda Viljoen-Bloom
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Evaluation of a recombinant insect-derived amylase performance in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process with industrial yeasts.

Authors:  Ewelina Celińska; Monika Borkowska; Wojciech Białas
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 4.813

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.