Literature DB >> 16130870

Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer.

Jorge Perdigão1, George Gomes, Sillas Duarte, M Manuela Lopes.   

Abstract

Most manufacturers of dental adhesives have both a total-etch adhesive and a simplified self-etching adhesive available on the market. This study measured the enamel microtensile bond strengths of five pairs of enamel adhesives as a function of enamel roughness. The proximal surfaces of 25 extracted mandibular molars were sectioned with a diamond saw to obtain 50 enamel rectangles with an area of 8x4 mm2. The enamel rectangles were divided in two equal parts via a groove to obtain 4x4 mm2 squared bonding surfaces. One half was roughened with a coarse diamond bur under water for five seconds, while the other half was kept intact. The enamel surfaces were randomly assigned to 10 enamel adhesives grouped into five pairs. Each pair included one self-etch adhesive and one total-etch adhesive from the same manufacturer: Adper Prompt and Adper Single Bond (PLP and SB, 3M ESPE); AdheSE and Excite (ADH and EXC, Ivoclar Vivadent); OptiBond Solo Plus SE and OptiBond Solo Plus (OPTSE and OPT, Kerr); Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus and One-Step (TYR and OST, BISCO, Inc); Xeno III and Prime&Bond NT (XEN and PBNT, Dentsply). The adhesives were applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. Buildups were constructed with Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE). The specimens were sectioned in sticks with a cross section of 0.8+/-0.2 mm2 and tested to failure in tension at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. Two-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's post-hoc test at p<0.05 was computed. The highest mean bond strengths were obtained with total-etch adhesives. For "roughened enamel," three pairs of materials had statistically different means in which the total-etch adhesive resulted in statistically higher bond strengths (MPa) than the corresponding self-etch adhesive: EXC (36.6) > ADH (23.0) at p<0.026; OPT (34.5) > OPTSE (25.3) at p<0.028; PBNT (36.6) > XEN (19.5) at p<0.0001. For "intact enamel," four pairs of materials resulted in statistically different means: SB (31.7) > PLP (20.9) at p<0.049; EXC (37.9) > ADH (16.3) at p<0.0001; OST (30.1) > TYR (18.0); PBNT (43.8) > XEN (16.0) at p<0.0001. When the same adhesive was compared on intact vs roughened enamel, all the self-etch materials resulted in lower bond strengths on intact enamel, but this difference was only significant for TYR (p<0.042) and ADH (p<0.050). For total-etch materials, only OPT resulted in statistically lower bond strengths when applied on intact enamel p<0.011).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16130870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Morphological Characteristics of Laser-Irradiated Dentin.

Authors:  Barbara Cvikl; Bledar Lilaj; Alexander Franz; Daniela Degendorfer; Andreas Moritz
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Eight-year clinical evaluation of two types of resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Kei Kaida; Shisei Kubo; Takafumi Egoshi; Yohsuke Taira
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Effect of EDTA and phosphoric Acid pretreatment on the bonding effectiveness of self-etch adhesives to ground enamel.

Authors:  Ihab M Ibrahim; Dina W Elkassas; Mai M Yousry
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-10

4.  Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and bur.

Authors:  Yonca Korkmaz; Emre Ozel; Nuray Attar; Ceren Ozge Bicer; Erhan Firatli
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Shear bond strength and SEM morphology evaluation of different dental adhesives to enamel prepared with ER:YAG laser.

Authors:  Patrícia T Pires; João C Ferreira; Sofia A Oliveira; Alvaro F Azevedo; Walter R Dias; Paulo R Melo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-01

6.  Comparative evaluation of the enamel bond strength of 'etch-and-rinse' and 'all-in-one' bonding agents on cut and uncut enamel surfaces.

Authors:  Deepu Patil; Kiran Prabhakar Singbal; Sharad Kamat
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-04

7.  Shear bond strengths and morphological evaluation of filled and unfilled adhesive interfaces to enamel and dentine.

Authors:  Vajihesadat Mortazavi; Mohammadhosein Fathi; Ebrahim Ataei; Niloufar Khodaeian; Navid Askari
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-11-06

8.  Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel.

Authors:  A Ruya Yazici; Zeren Yildirim; Atila Ertan; Gül Ozgunaltay; Berrin Dayangac; Sibel A Antonson; Donald E Antonson
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-07

9.  Direct restorative treatment of missing maxillary laterals with composite laminate veneer: a case report.

Authors:  Bora Bagis; Elif Aydoğan; Yildirim H Bagis
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2008-06-13

10.  Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  R Veena Kumari; Ramya Krishna Poluri; Hema Nagaraj; Kishore Siddaruju
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.