Literature DB >> 16129848

Loss of heterozygosity for chromosomes 1p and 16q is an adverse prognostic factor in favorable-histology Wilms tumor: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group.

Paul E Grundy1, Norman E Breslow, Sierra Li, Elizabeth Perlman, J Bruce Beckwith, Michael L Ritchey, Robert C Shamberger, Gerald M Haase, Giulio J D'Angio, Milton Donaldson, Max J Coppes, Marcio Malogolowkin, Patricia Shearer, Patrick R M Thomas, Roger Macklis, Gail Tomlinson, Vicki Huff, Daniel M Green.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if tumor-specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for chromosomes 1p or 16q is associated with a poorer prognosis for children with favorable-histology (FH) Wilms tumor entered on the fifth National Wilms Tumor Study (NWTS-5). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1995 and June 2002, 2,021 previously untreated children with FH or anaplastic Wilms tumor, clear-cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK) or malignant rhabdoid tumor of the kidney (RTK), were treated with stage- and histology-specific therapy. Their tumors were assayed for LOH for polymorphic DNA markers on chromosomes 1p and 16q. ResultsLOH for 1p or 16q was rarely observed in CCSK (n = 90) or RTK (n = 22). The relative risk (RR) of relapse for patients with FH stage I to IV tumors with LOH, stratified by stage, was 1.56 for LOH 1p (P = .01) and 1.49 for LOH 16q (P = .01), whereas the RR of death was 1.84 (P = .03) and 1.44 (P = .15), respectively. When the effects of LOH for both regions were considered jointly among patients with stage I to II FH disease, the risks of relapse and death were increased for LOH 1p only (RR = 2.2, P = .02 for relapse; RR = 4.0, P = .02 for death), for LOH 16q only (RR = 1.9, P = .01 and RR = 1.4, P = .60) and for LOH for both regions (RR = 2.9, P = .001 and RR = 4.3, P = .01) in comparison with patients with LOH at neither locus. The risks of relapse and death for patients with stage III to IV FH tumors were increased only with LOH for both regions (RR = 2.4, P = .01 and RR = 2.7, P = .04).
CONCLUSION: Tumor-specific LOH for both chromosomes 1p and 16q identifies a subset of FH Wilms tumor patients who have a significantly increased risk of relapse and death. LOH for these chromosomal regions can now be used as an independent prognostic factor together with disease stage to target intensity of treatment to risk of treatment failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16129848     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.2799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  111 in total

1.  High-resolution genomic profiling of an adult Wilms' tumor: evidence for a pathogenesis distinct from corresponding pediatric tumors.

Authors:  Jenny Karlsson; Linda Holmquist Mengelbier; Peter Elfving; David Gisselsson Nord
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Current management of wilms' tumor.

Authors:  Leah Nakamura; Michael Ritchey
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Andrew M Davidoff
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Considerations in the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Patients With Favorable Histology Wilms Tumor Who Present With Only Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Daniel M Green
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  WT1 mutation and 11P15 loss of heterozygosity predict relapse in very low-risk wilms tumors treated with surgery alone: a children's oncology group study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Perlman; Paul E Grundy; James R Anderson; Lawrence J Jennings; Daniel M Green; Jeffrey S Dome; Robert C Shamberger; E Cristy Ruteshouser; Vicki Huff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Stage III Favorable-Histology Wilms Tumor: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Study AREN0532.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Elizabeth A Mullen; Yueh-Yun Chi; Peter F Ehrlich; Elizabeth J Perlman; John A Kalapurakal; Geetika Khanna; Arnold C Paulino; Thomas E Hamilton; Kenneth W Gow; Zelig Tochner; Fredric A Hoffer; Janice S Withycombe; Robert C Shamberger; Yeonil Kim; James I Geller; James R Anderson; Paul E Grundy; Jeffrey S Dome
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Clinicopathologic findings predictive of relapse in children with stage III favorable-histology Wilms tumor.

Authors:  Peter F Ehrlich; James R Anderson; Michael L Ritchey; Jeffrey S Dome; Daniel M Green; Paul E Grundy; Elizabeth J Perlman; John A Kalapurakal; Norman E Breslow; Robert C Shamberger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: renal tumors.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Dome; Conrad V Fernandez; Elizabeth A Mullen; John A Kalapurakal; James I Geller; Vicki Huff; Eric J Gratias; David B Dix; Peter F Ehrlich; Geetika Khanna; Marcio H Malogolowkin; James R Anderson; Arlene Naranjo; Elizabeth J Perlman
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Subsets of very low risk Wilms tumor show distinctive gene expression, histologic, and clinical features.

Authors:  Simone T Sredni; Samantha Gadd; Chiang-Ching Huang; Norman Breslow; Paul Grundy; Daniel M Green; Jeffrey S Dome; Robert C Shamberger; J Bruce Beckwith; Elizabeth J Perlman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Secondary malignant neoplasms after Wilms tumor: an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Norman E Breslow; Jane M Lange; Debra L Friedman; Daniel M Green; Mike M Hawkins; Michael F G Murphy; Joseph P Neglia; Jørgen H Olsen; Susan M Peterson; Charles A Stiller; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.