Gun-Il Im1, Yong-Woon Shin, Kee-Byung Lee. 1. Hallym University Hospital, Orthopaedics, 896 Pyong-Chon Dong, Anyang 431-070, Republic of Korea. gunil@hallym.ac.kr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ATMSCs) have been shown to differentiate into bone, cartilage, fat or muscle. However, it is not certain that ATMSCs are equal to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSC) for their bone and cartilage forming potential. The purpose of this study was to answer the question. METHODS: BMMSCs were obtained from the medullary canal of femur and ATMSCs were isolated from the fat harvested during liposuction procedures. After cell expansion in culture media and two passages, the immunofluorescent studies for STRO-1 and CD34 were performed to characterize the BMMSCs and ATMSCs. Osteogenesis was induced on a monolayer culture with osteogenic medium containing dexamethasone, beta-glycerophosphate and ascorbate. After 2-3 weeks, alkaline phosphatase (AP) and Von Kossa staining were done. To test for chondrogenesis, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were cultured in a pellet culture and in a fibrin scaffold with a chondrogenic medium (CM) containing transforming growth factor-beta(2) and insulin-like growth factor-I. After 4 weeks, Safranin-O staining and immunohistochemical staining for type II collagen were done to evaluate the chondrogenic differentiation and the matrix production. A histological scale was used to semiquantitatively assess the degree of chondrogenesis. RESULTS: Both BMMSCs and ATMSCs were STRO-1 positive and CD34 negative. On the test of osteogenesis, the osteoblastic differentiation of ATMSCs as demonstrated by AP staining was much less than that of the BMMSCs (P=0.002). The amount of matrix mineralization shown by Von Kossa staining also showed statistical differences between the two MSCs (P=0.011). On the test for chondrogenesis by the pellet culture ATMSCs showed much weaker presentation as chondrogenic cells in both cell morphology and the matrix production. The histological score was 6.5 (SD1.3) for the BMMSCs, and 4.3 (SD1.6) for the ATMSCs cultured in CM, which was statistically significant (P=0.023). The results from fibrin gel paralleled those from the pellet culture in general. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that the ATMSCs may have an inferior potential for both osteogenesis and chondrogenesis compared with the BMMSCs, and these cast doubts on the value of adipose tissue as a source of MSCs.
OBJECTIVE: Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ATMSCs) have been shown to differentiate into bone, cartilage, fat or muscle. However, it is not certain that ATMSCs are equal to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSC) for their bone and cartilage forming potential. The purpose of this study was to answer the question. METHODS: BMMSCs were obtained from the medullary canal of femur and ATMSCs were isolated from the fat harvested during liposuction procedures. After cell expansion in culture media and two passages, the immunofluorescent studies for STRO-1 and CD34 were performed to characterize the BMMSCs and ATMSCs. Osteogenesis was induced on a monolayer culture with osteogenic medium containing dexamethasone, beta-glycerophosphate and ascorbate. After 2-3 weeks, alkaline phosphatase (AP) and Von Kossa staining were done. To test for chondrogenesis, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were cultured in a pellet culture and in a fibrin scaffold with a chondrogenic medium (CM) containing transforming growth factor-beta(2) and insulin-like growth factor-I. After 4 weeks, Safranin-O staining and immunohistochemical staining for type II collagen were done to evaluate the chondrogenic differentiation and the matrix production. A histological scale was used to semiquantitatively assess the degree of chondrogenesis. RESULTS: Both BMMSCs and ATMSCs were STRO-1 positive and CD34 negative. On the test of osteogenesis, the osteoblastic differentiation of ATMSCs as demonstrated by AP staining was much less than that of the BMMSCs (P=0.002). The amount of matrix mineralization shown by Von Kossa staining also showed statistical differences between the two MSCs (P=0.011). On the test for chondrogenesis by the pellet culture ATMSCs showed much weaker presentation as chondrogenic cells in both cell morphology and the matrix production. The histological score was 6.5 (SD1.3) for the BMMSCs, and 4.3 (SD1.6) for the ATMSCs cultured in CM, which was statistically significant (P=0.023). The results from fibrin gel paralleled those from the pellet culture in general. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that the ATMSCs may have an inferior potential for both osteogenesis and chondrogenesis compared with the BMMSCs, and these cast doubts on the value of adipose tissue as a source of MSCs.
Authors: Gregory M Cooper; Emily L Durham; James J Cray; Michael R Bykowski; Gary E DeCesare; Melissa A Smalley; Mark P Mooney; Phil G Campbell; Joseph E Losee Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Sofia Bougioukli; Osamu Sugiyama; William Pannell; Brandon Ortega; Matthew H Tan; Amy H Tang; Robert Yoho; Daniel A Oakes; Jay R Lieberman Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 5.695