Literature DB >> 16127270

Auditory stream segregation in the songbird forebrain: effects of time intervals on responses to interleaved tone sequences.

Mark A Bee1, Georg M Klump.   

Abstract

For both humans and other animals, the abilities to integrate separate sound elements over time into coherent perceptual representations, or 'auditory streams', and to segregate these auditory streams from other interleaved sounds are critical for hearing and vocal communication. In humans and European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) the ability to perceptually segregate a simple interleaved tone sequence comprised of two alternating tones differing in frequency (ABA-ABA-ABA-...) into separate auditory streams of A and B tones is promoted at larger frequency separations (DeltaF) between the A and B tones. In humans, segregating A and B tones into different streams also appears to be promoted at shorter interstimulus intervals (ISI) between tones within a stream (e.g., between consecutive A tones). Here, we used the ABA experimental paradigm to investigate the influence of different time intervals between A and B tones in repeated ABA triplets on neural responses in the starling forebrain. The main finding from the study is that a DeltaF-dependent effect of ISI had a large influence on the relative responses to A and B tones. Responses to B tones were suppressed, relative to A-tone responses, when the A and B tones were more similar in frequency (smaller DeltaFs) and occurred at shorter ISIs. We attribute these suppressive effects to physiological forward masking and suggest that forward masking functions as a mechanism for segregating neural responses to interleaved tones in tonotopic space. We discuss the relevance of our physiological data with respect to previous electrophysiological studies of auditory stream segregation in mammals and previous perceptual studies in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16127270     DOI: 10.1159/000087854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  33 in total

Review 1.  Behind the scenes of auditory perception.

Authors:  Shihab A Shamma; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-24

3.  Membrane potential dynamics of populations of cortical neurons during auditory streaming.

Authors:  Brandon J Farley; Arnaud J Noreña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cortical FMRI activation to sequences of tones alternating in frequency: relationship to perceived rate and streaming.

Authors:  E Courtenay Wilson; Jennifer R Melcher; Christophe Micheyl; Alexander Gutschalk; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Influence of double stimulation on sound-localization behavior in barn owls.

Authors:  Lutz Kettler; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Animal models for auditory streaming.

Authors:  Naoya Itatani; Georg M Klump
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Temporal coherence in the perceptual organization and cortical representation of auditory scenes.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Ling Ma; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Forward masking estimated by signal detection theory analysis of neuronal responses in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ana Alves-Pinto; Sylvie Baudoux; Alan R Palmer; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-06

10.  Neurophysiological mechanisms involved in auditory perceptual organization.

Authors:  Aurelie Bidet-Caulet; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.