Literature DB >> 1612476

Assessment of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tube as part of an integrated approach to enteral feeding.

C Wicks1, A Gimson, P Vlavianos, M Lombard, M Panos, P Macmathuna, M Tudor, K Andrews, D Westaby.   

Abstract

The insertion of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy has been well documented. The possible benefits for patient nutrition and nursing practice have, however, not been assessed. We report a study of enteral feeding by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in 30 patients, the majority with a persistent vegetative state. All patients had previously been fed through a nasogastric tube using manual administration and a dietitian assessed protein calorie intake. Based upon body mass index (weight/height2), midarm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness, 20 (67%) were malnourished, with 10 patients having a body mass index less than 17 (severe malnutrition); attributed to high rates of both tube displacement and feed regurgitation. Patients were observed over six to 12 months after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion combined with overnight continuous pump feeding. All patients attained a body mass index greater than 17, and 17 (56%) of the total number achieved the normal range with no change in protein-calorie intake (pre: 2110 kcal, post: 1880 kcal). Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the study group included peritonitis (one), tube site infection (two) and displacement (two); all without serious sequelae. As part of an integrated approach percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy proved a safe and efficient method of enteral feeding and justifies wider consideration in the United Kingdom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1612476      PMCID: PMC1379288          DOI: 10.1136/gut.33.5.613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  25 in total

1.  Aspiration pneumonia in patients fed through nasoenteral tubes.

Authors:  N A Metheny; P Eisenberg; M Spies
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.210

Review 2.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies: a prospective evaluation and review of the literature.

Authors:  D F Kirby; R M Craig; T K Tsang; B H Plotnick
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Inadvertent dislodgement of nasoenteral feeding tubes: incidence and prevention.

Authors:  J A Meer
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Dangers of placement of narrow bore nasogastric feeding tubes.

Authors:  M Biggart; P J McQuillan; A K Choudhry; R W Nickalls
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Obese, overweight, desirable, ideal: where to draw the line in 1986?

Authors:  L O Schulz
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1986-12

6.  Clogging of feeding tubes.

Authors:  S P Marcuard; A M Perkins
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a preferred method of feeding tube gastrostomy.

Authors:  B S Thatcher; D R Ferguson; K Paradis
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Complications associated with a narrow bore nasogastric tube.

Authors:  T W Grossman; J A Duncavage; B Dennison; J Kay; R J Toohill
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Estimation of the mid-upper arm circumference measurement error.

Authors:  C W Bishop; S J Pitchey
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1987-04

10.  A comparison of continuous and intermittent enteral nutrition in NICU patients.

Authors:  M J Kocan; S M Hickisch
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.230

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Enteral feeding. Nasogastric, nasojejunal, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or jejunostomy: its indications and limitations.

Authors:  C B Pearce; H D Duncan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  I Forgacs; A Macpherson; C Tibbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-30

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  S G Williams; F Ashworth; A McAlweenie; S Poole; M E Hodson; D Westaby
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Disease-associated malnutrition in the year 2000.

Authors:  C R Pennington
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Cost analysis of long-term feeding by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients in an Italian health district.

Authors:  S Sartori; L Trevisani; D Tassinari; G Gilli; I Nielsen; A Maestri; V Abbasciano
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and enteral nutrition in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  L Mazzini; T Corrà; M Zaccala; G Mora; M Del Piano; M Galante
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Acute pancreatitis and cholangitis: a complication caused by a migrated gastrostomy tube.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamura; Toshihiro Konagaya; Takashi Hashimoto; Kunio Kasugai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  C Löser; S Wolters; U R Fölsch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke.

Authors:  B Norton; M Homer-Ward; M T Donnelly; R G Long; G K Holmes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-06

10.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a general hospital: prospective evaluation of indications, outcome, and randomised comparison of two tube designs.

Authors:  M Z Panos; H Reilly; A Moran; T Reilly; P J Wallis; R Wears; I M Chesner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.