Literature DB >> 16123867

[The role of 3-D imaging and computer-based postprocessing for surgery of the liver and pancreas].

L Grenacher1, M Thorn, H P Knaebel, M Vetter, P Hassenpflug, T Kraus, H P Meinzer, M W Büchler, G W Kauffmann, G M Richter.   

Abstract

Cross-sectional imaging based on navigation and virtual reality planning tools are well-established in the surgical routine in orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery. In various procedures, they have achieved a significant clinical relevance and efficacy and have enhanced the discipline's resection capabilities. In abdominal surgery, however, these tools have gained little attraction so far. Even with the advantage of fast and high resolution cross-sectional liver and pancreas imaging, it remains unclear whether 3D planning and interactive planning tools might increase precision and safety of liver and pancreas surgery. The inability to simply transfer the methodology from orthopedic or neurosurgery is mainly a result of intraoperative organ movements and shifting and corresponding technical difficulties in the on-line applicability of presurgical cross sectional imaging data. For the interactive planning of liver surgery, three systems partly exist in daily routine: HepaVision2 (MeVis GmbH, Bremen), LiverLive (Navidez Ltd, Slovenia) and OrgaNicer (German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg). All these systems have realized a half- or full-automatic liver-segmentation procedure to visualize liver segments, vessel trees, resected volumes or critical residual organ volumes, either for preoperative planning or intraoperative visualization. Acquisition of data is mainly based on computed tomography. Three-dimensional navigation for intraoperative surgical guidance with ultrasound is part of the clinical testing. There are only few reports about the transfer of the visualization of the pancreas, probably caused by the difficulties with the segmentation routine due to inflammation or organ-exceeding tumor growth. With this paper, we like to evaluate and demonstrate the present status of software planning tools and pathways for future pre- and intraoperative resection planning in liver and pancreas surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16123867     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  11 in total

1.  Interventional navigation for abdominal therapy based on simultaneous use of MRI and ultrasound.

Authors:  J Hong; H Nakashima; K Konishi; S Ieiri; K Tanoue; M Nakamuta; M Hashizume
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  [Importance of preoperative and intraoperative imaging for operative strategies].

Authors:  P Nitschke; U Bork; V Plodeck; D Podlesek; S B Sobottka; G Schackert; J Weitz; M Kirsch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  [Primary sarcomas and sarcoma metastases in the liver: morphological and molecular aspects].

Authors:  G Mechtersheimer; R Penzel; W J Hofmann; P Schirmacher
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Value of three-dimensional reconstructions in pancreatic carcinoma using multidetector CT: initial results.

Authors:  Miriam Klauss; Max Schöbinger; Ivo Wolf; Jens Werner; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Lars Grenacher
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Liver tissue sparing resection using a novel planning tool.

Authors:  Frank Pianka; Matthias Baumhauer; Daniel Stein; Boris Radeleff; Bruno M Schmied; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Sascha A Müller
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in pediatric musculoskeletal oncological resections: a proof-of-concept description.

Authors:  Jayanthi Parthasarathy; Brandon Jonard; Mitchell Rees; Bhavani Selvaraj; Thomas Scharschmidt
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.421

7.  Quantitative tumor segmentation for evaluation of extent of glioblastoma resection to facilitate multisite clinical trials.

Authors:  James S Cordova; Eduard Schreibmann; Costas G Hadjipanayis; Ying Guo; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; Chad A Holder
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 8.  [Preoperative imaging/operation planning for liver surgery].

Authors:  W N Schoening; T Denecke; U P Neumann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Use of the Resection Map system as guidance during hepatectomy.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Félix Lamata; Valentin Sojar; Piotr Makowski; Laurent Massoptier; Sergio Casciaro; Wajid Ali; Thomas Stüdeli; Jérôme Declerck; Ole Jakob Elle; Ole Jackov Elle; Bjørn Edwin; Björn Edwin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Does preoperative analysis of intrahepatic venous anastomoses improve the surgeon's intraoperative decision making? Pilot data from a case report.

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Max Schoebinger; Jan-Oliver Neumann; Sascha Müller; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Markus W Büchler; Bruno M Schmied
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2008-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.