Literature DB >> 16122989

Exploring websites on cancer clinical trials: an empirical review.

Christian Simon1, Sarah Hegedus.   

Abstract

The Internet houses tens of thousands of cancer-related websites, a growing number of which are devoted in some way to cancer clinical research. To date, little is known about the range, content, and general quality of these websites. This study selected the first 100 websites returned after searching the Internet for "cancer clinical trial" (CCT). Of these, 66 websites were examined page by page to characterize their range, content, and general quality. The study found evidence of considerable diversity among CCT-related websites. Many may be useful to clinical investigators or patients interested in participating in CCTs. However, a proportion were difficult to navigate and understand, lacked confidentiality and other assurances, and raised questions about cost, access, and the potential for biasing study samples. Further research is needed to determine the opportunities and drawbacks presented by online efforts to enhance knowledge of and access to cancer clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16122989     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2005.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  7 in total

1.  Using the Internet to search for cancer clinical trials: a comparative audit of clinical trial search tools.

Authors:  Nancy L Atkinson; Sandra L Saperstein; Holly A Massett; Colleen Ryan Leonard; Lakshmi Grama; Rick Manrow
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Outcomes of a cancer clinical trial matching service.

Authors:  Ted Gansler; Man Jin; Joseph Bauer; Katie Dahlquist; Larissa Tis; Katherine Sharpe; Robert Comis; Kimberly Naples; James Kepner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Patient internet use surrounding cancer clinical trials: clinician perceptions and responses.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Sarah Schramm; Stephen Hillis
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Consumer input into research: the Australian Cancer Trials website.

Authors:  Rachel F Dear; Alexandra L Barratt; Sally Crossing; Phyllis N Butow; Susan Hanson; Martin Hn Tattersall
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2011-06-26

5.  Readability of Cancer Clinical Trials Websites.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Melissa Beauchemin; Philip Garcia; Moshe Kelsen; Frances L Brogan; Gary K Schwartz; Corey H Basch
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  User-centered research on breast cancer patient needs and preferences of an Internet-based clinical trial matching system.

Authors:  Nancy L Atkinson; Holly A Massett; Christy Mylks; Bethany Hanna; Mary Jo Deering; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Developing a web-based information resource for palliative care: an action-research inspired approach.

Authors:  Annette F Street; Kathleen Swift; Merilyn Annells; Roger Woodruff; Terry Gliddon; Anne Oakley; Goetz Ottman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.