Literature DB >> 16120767

Intranasal concentrations of orally administered flavors.

Johannes Frasnelli1, Saskia van Ruth, Irina Kriukova, Thomas Hummel.   

Abstract

The odorants emanating from the oral cavity during eating and drinking reach the olfactory mucosa via the pharynx (retronasal olfaction). It is unclear which variables influence the perception of intraorally applied substances. The aim of the present study was to determine the temporal profiles of volatile odor concentrations at different locations in the nasal cavity during consumption of liquid and solid custard samples using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Intranasal odor concentrations were measured at least twice in nine subjects (six female, three male) at four nasal positions during the consumption of liquid and solid custards. The low-viscosity custard was swallowed earlier than the more solid one. The compounds were found to reach the nose in different concentrations. Largest maximal amplitudes were measured in the nasopharynx, whereas lowest concentrations were found in the region of the olfactory cleft. In addition, different odorants reached the different regions in the nasal cavity in varying concentrations, indicated by a significant interaction between factors "position" and "compound". Furthermore, the compounds were found to reach the positions within the nasal cavity with different latencies. These results indicate that different volatile flavor compounds exhibit different temporal and spatial profiles in terms of their intranasal distribution.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16120767     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bji051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  8 in total

1.  Responses of the rat olfactory epithelium to retronasal air flow.

Authors:  John W Scott; Humberto P Acevedo; Lisa Sherrill; Maggie Phan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Grade 4 tonsillar hypertrophy associated with decreased retronasal olfactory function: a pilot study.

Authors:  Melih Cayonu; Murat Salihoglu; Aytug Altundag; Hakan Tekeli; Gürkan Kayabasoglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Trigeminal antihyperalgesic effect of intranasal carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Alexander Z Tzabazis; Sharon H Niv; Neil A Manering; Mikhail Klyukinov; Jason M Cuellar; Anish Bhatnagar; David C Yeomans
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.037

4.  Retronasal Aroma of Beef Pate Analyzed by a Chewing Simulator.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hayashi; Yuji Nakada; Etienne Sémon; Christian Salles
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Direct behavioral evidence for retronasal olfaction in rats.

Authors:  Shree Hari Gautam; Justus V Verhagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Orthonasal versus retronasal glomerular activity in rat olfactory bulb by fMRI.

Authors:  Basavaraju G Sanganahalli; Keeley L Baker; Garth J Thompson; Peter Herman; Gordon M Shepherd; Justus V Verhagen; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 7.400

7.  Glomerular input patterns in the mouse olfactory bulb evoked by retronasal odor stimuli.

Authors:  Yuichi Furudono; Ginny Cruz; Graeme Lowe
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  An investigation of retronasal testing of olfactory function in a Turkish population.

Authors:  Murat Salihoglu; Aytug Altundag; Melih Cayonu; Hakan Tekeli
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-04-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.