Literature DB >> 1611922

Lung cancer risk and social class. The Copenhagen Male Study--17-year follow up.

H O Hein1, P Suadicani, F Gyntelberg.   

Abstract

The Copenhagen Male Study is a prospective cohort study initiated in 1970/71 comprising 5249 employed men between the ages of 40 and 59 years. Included in a registry follow up of lung cancer were 4931 men who responded sufficiently to a number of questions on tobacco habits and who could be classified into social classes. During the 17 years of follow up, lung cancer was diagnosed in 144 men. By the end of the follow up period, 135 had died. Substantial social inequalities in the risk of lung cancer were found with a gradually increased risk with low social class, Kendall's tau B = 0.07, p less than 0.001. In multivariate analysis, compared with the highest social class (highly educated, administrators), the lowest social class (unskilled workers), had a highly increased risk, relative risk (with 95% confidence limits), RR = 3.7 (1.9-7.3). If in the analysis, adjustments were made for form of smoking, amount smoked, whether inhalation took place, number of pack-years and age, the increased risk dropped to RR = 2.9 (1.5-5.9). We conclude that the substantial social inequalities in lung cancer risk are only to a minor degree explained by social class differences in tobacco smoking habits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1611922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med Bull        ISSN: 0907-8916


  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the 1900s relating smoking to lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter N Lee; Barbara A Forey; Katharine J Coombs
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 2.  The epidemiology of lung cancer: review of risk factors and Spanish data.

Authors:  B Takkouche; J J Gestal-Otero
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Lung cancer: is there an association with socioeconomic status in The Netherlands?

Authors:  A J van Loon; R A Goldbohm; P A van den Brandt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Socioeconomic status and lung cancer: unraveling the contribution of genetic admixture.

Authors:  Melinda C Aldrich; Steve Selvin; Margaret R Wrensch; Jennette D Sison; Helen M Hansen; Charles P Quesenberry; Michael F Seldin; Lisa F Barcellos; Patricia A Buffler; John K Wiencke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Quality of life in lung cancer patients: does socioeconomic status matter?

Authors:  Ali Montazeri; David J Hole; Robert Milroy; James McEwen; Charles R Gillis
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-06-09       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Are there social gradients in the occurrence of lung cancer and in the survival of lung cancer patients? Findings from an observational study using German claims data of Lower Saxony.

Authors:  Sebastian Schröder; Johannes Beller; Heiko Golpon; Siegfried Geyer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.