OBJECTIVES: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a well-known and -utilized tumor marker for prostate cancer. Elevated PSA values are not specific for prostate cancer as they may be caused by other benign conditions. PSA testing is widely used by urologists and non-urologists. Interpretation of test results is difficult but important. Referral of patients for further work-up on suspicion of prostate diseases is mainly done by general practitioners (GPs). As the GP remains the gatekeeper between the patient and the urologist in terms of diagnosing prostate diseases, basic knowledge of PSA testing is crucial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the basic use and knowledge of PSA testing and to give an estimate of the need for further education in PSA testing amongst GPs in our area. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire regarding PSA testing and associated needs for education was mailed to all GPs in the Northern County of Denmark. Non-respondents were contacted by mail. RESULTS: Of the contacted GPs, 90% responded. Only 28% of GPs measured PSA in all males complaining of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Of patients seen as part of a general health check-up, PSA testing was done in 10%. The median PSA value for referral to urologists for further work-up was 5 ng/ml, but the decision was influenced by PSA value (79%), age (65%) and findings on digital rectal examination (DRE) (87%). Opportunistic screening for prostate cancer was done by 14% of GPs. Of the GPs who responded, 24% stated that they did not need any further education regarding PSA testing. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that PSA testing is not standardized in our area. GPs do not test patients on the basis of recommendations provided by national or international societies. PSA testing is not used as a standard test in men with LUTS, and patients are not referred to urologists at a sufficiently low PSA level to improve the early diagnosis and work-up of patients with suspected prostate cancer. However, the decision of many GPs to refer patients to urologists for further work-up is influenced by the findings of a DRE, the age of the patient and the PSA value itself. Further education regarding PSA testing amongst GPs in our area would seem to be appropriate.
OBJECTIVES:Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a well-known and -utilized tumor marker for prostate cancer. Elevated PSA values are not specific for prostate cancer as they may be caused by other benign conditions. PSA testing is widely used by urologists and non-urologists. Interpretation of test results is difficult but important. Referral of patients for further work-up on suspicion of prostate diseases is mainly done by general practitioners (GPs). As the GP remains the gatekeeper between the patient and the urologist in terms of diagnosing prostate diseases, basic knowledge of PSA testing is crucial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the basic use and knowledge of PSA testing and to give an estimate of the need for further education in PSA testing amongst GPs in our area. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire regarding PSA testing and associated needs for education was mailed to all GPs in the Northern County of Denmark. Non-respondents were contacted by mail. RESULTS: Of the contacted GPs, 90% responded. Only 28% of GPs measured PSA in all males complaining of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Of patients seen as part of a general health check-up, PSA testing was done in 10%. The median PSA value for referral to urologists for further work-up was 5 ng/ml, but the decision was influenced by PSA value (79%), age (65%) and findings on digital rectal examination (DRE) (87%). Opportunistic screening for prostate cancer was done by 14% of GPs. Of the GPs who responded, 24% stated that they did not need any further education regarding PSA testing. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that PSA testing is not standardized in our area. GPs do not test patients on the basis of recommendations provided by national or international societies. PSA testing is not used as a standard test in men with LUTS, and patients are not referred to urologists at a sufficiently low PSA level to improve the early diagnosis and work-up of patients with suspected prostate cancer. However, the decision of many GPs to refer patients to urologists for further work-up is influenced by the findings of a DRE, the age of the patient and the PSA value itself. Further education regarding PSA testing amongst GPs in our area would seem to be appropriate.
Authors: Michael L Eisenberg; Yikyung Park; Louise A Brinton; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: S Lebentrau; M May; O Maurer; M Schostak; M Lehsnau; T Ecke; S Al-Dumaini; S Hallmann; A M Ahmed; V Braun; A Haferkamp; R M Bauer; C G Stief; D Baumunk; B Hoschke; H-P Braun; C Schäfer; M Hipp; J Maurer; K-P Braun; I Wolff; S Brookman-May; C Gilfrich Journal: Urologe A Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Saskia Van der Meer; Sabine A M Löwik; Willem H Hirdes; Rien M Nijman; Klaas Van der Meer; Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers; Marco H Blanker Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 2.497