Literature DB >> 16117758

Continuous quality improvement in rural health clinics.

Ghassan F Salman1.   

Abstract

AIM: Continuous quality improvement has been shown to work in urban and suburban clinics. The objective of this project is to test whether continuous quality improvement would improve the quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension in a rural health clinic.
SETTING: Rural health clinic with 3 providers and two and half full-time registered nurses. Patients were mostly older adults with Medicare health insurance. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Health care providers and nursing staff agreed on the quality improvement project. The intervention included providing quarterly feedback to health care providers, empowering the nurses to remind patients of diabetes care, and flagging the charts to remind providers. PROGRAM EVALUATION: The proportions of diabetic patients who had ophthalmologic exam, pneumococcal vaccine and lipid screening significantly improved over 12-month period. The proportions of patients with hypertension who had blood pressure less than 140/90 and patients who were taking aspirin also significantly improved over 12-month period.
CONCLUSION: The quality of care for patients with diabetes and patients with hypertension could be improved in rural health clinics using repetitive cycles of measurements, implementation of interventions and evaluation of outcomes. This process could be used as the backbone for translation of evidence into practice and improving quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16117758      PMCID: PMC1490210          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0187.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  18 in total

1.  American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Recommendations 2001.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  The evidence base for tight blood pressure control in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Vincenza Snow; Kevin B Weiss; Christel Mottur-Pilson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; S E Hanna; K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress.

Authors:  S M Shortell; C L Bennett; G R Byck
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 6.  Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers.

Authors:  R H Brook; E A McGlynn; P G Shekelle
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  Effectiveness of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa A Jackson; Kathleen M Neuzil; Onchee Yu; Patti Benson; William E Barlow; Annette L Adams; Christi A Hanson; Lisa D Mahoney; David K Shay; William W Thompson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group.

Authors:  L Hansson; A Zanchetti; S G Carruthers; B Dahlöf; D Elmfeldt; S Julius; J Ménard; K H Rahn; H Wedel; S Westerling
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Clinician awareness of adherence to hypertension guidelines.

Authors:  Michael A Steinman; Melissa A Fischer; Michael G Shlipak; Hayden B Bosworth; Eugene Z Oddone; Brian B Hoffman; Mary K Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.965

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.