PURPOSE: In the Children's Oncology Group, risk group assignment for neuroblastoma is critical for therapeutic decisions, and patients are stratified by International Neuroblastoma Staging System stage, MYCN status, ploidy, Shimada histopathology, and diagnosis age. Age less than 365 days has been associated with favorable outcome, but recent studies suggest that older age cutoff may improve prognostic precision. METHODS: To identify the optimal age cutoff, we retrospectively analyzed data from the Pediatric Oncology Group biology study 9047 and Children's Cancer Group studies 321p1-p4, 3881, 3891, and B973 on 3,666 patients (1986 to 2001) with documented ages and follow-up data. Twenty-seven separate analyses, one for each different age cutoff (adjusting for MYCN and stage), tested age influence on outcome. The cutoff that maximized outcome difference between younger and older patients was selected. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of patients were younger than 365 days, and 64% were > or = 365 days old (4-year event-free survival [EFS] rate +/- SE: 83% +/- 1% [n = 1,339] and 45% +/- 1% [n = 2,327], respectively; P < .0001). Graphical analyses revealed the continuous nature of the prognostic contribution of age to outcome. The optimal 460-day cutoff we selected maximized the outcome difference between younger and older patients. Forty-three percent were younger than 460 days, and 57% were > or = 460 days old (4-year EFS rate +/- SE: 82% +/- 1% [n = 1,589] and 42% +/- 1% [n = 2,077], respectively; P < .0001). Using a 460-day cutoff (assuming stage 4, MYCN-amplified patients remain high-risk), 5% of patients (365 to 460 days: 4-year EFS 92% +/- 3%; n = 135) fell into a lower risk group. CONCLUSION: The prognostic contribution of age to outcome is continuous in nature. Within clinically relevant risk stratification, statistical support exists for an age cutoff of 460 days.
PURPOSE: In the Children's Oncology Group, risk group assignment for neuroblastoma is critical for therapeutic decisions, and patients are stratified by International Neuroblastoma Staging System stage, MYCN status, ploidy, Shimada histopathology, and diagnosis age. Age less than 365 days has been associated with favorable outcome, but recent studies suggest that older age cutoff may improve prognostic precision. METHODS: To identify the optimal age cutoff, we retrospectively analyzed data from the Pediatric Oncology Group biology study 9047 and Children's Cancer Group studies 321p1-p4, 3881, 3891, and B973 on 3,666 patients (1986 to 2001) with documented ages and follow-up data. Twenty-seven separate analyses, one for each different age cutoff (adjusting for MYCN and stage), tested age influence on outcome. The cutoff that maximized outcome difference between younger and older patients was selected. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of patients were younger than 365 days, and 64% were > or = 365 days old (4-year event-free survival [EFS] rate +/- SE: 83% +/- 1% [n = 1,339] and 45% +/- 1% [n = 2,327], respectively; P < .0001). Graphical analyses revealed the continuous nature of the prognostic contribution of age to outcome. The optimal 460-day cutoff we selected maximized the outcome difference between younger and older patients. Forty-three percent were younger than 460 days, and 57% were > or = 460 days old (4-year EFS rate +/- SE: 82% +/- 1% [n = 1,589] and 42% +/- 1% [n = 2,077], respectively; P < .0001). Using a 460-day cutoff (assuming stage 4, MYCN-amplified patients remain high-risk), 5% of patients (365 to 460 days: 4-year EFS 92% +/- 3%; n = 135) fell into a lower risk group. CONCLUSION: The prognostic contribution of age to outcome is continuous in nature. Within clinically relevant risk stratification, statistical support exists for an age cutoff of 460 days.
Authors: Yania Yáñez; David Hervás; Elena Grau; Silvestre Oltra; Gema Pérez; Sarai Palanca; Mar Bermúdez; Catalina Márquez; Adela Cañete; Victoria Castel Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2015-10-24 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Katherine K Matthay; C Patrick Reynolds; Robert C Seeger; Hiroyuki Shimada; E Stanton Adkins; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Robert B Gerbing; Wendy B London; Judith G Villablanca Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Ángel Alberich-Bayarri; Ruth Ladenstein; Ignacio Blanquer; J Damian Segrelles; Leonor Cerdá-Alberich; Polyxeni Gkontra; Barbara Hero; J M García-Aznar; Daniel Keim; Wolfgang Jentner; Karine Seymour; Ana Jiménez-Pastor; Ismael González-Valverde; Blanca Martínez de Las Heras; Samira Essiaf; Dawn Walker; Michel Rochette; Marian Bubak; Jordi Mestres; Marco Viceconti; Gracia Martí-Besa; Adela Cañete; Paul Richmond; Kenneth Y Wertheim; Tomasz Gubala; Marek Kasztelnik; Jan Meizner; Piotr Nowakowski; Salvador Gilpérez; Amelia Suárez; Mario Aznar; Giuliana Restante; Emanuele Neri Journal: Eur Radiol Exp Date: 2020-04-03
Authors: Victoria Castel; Eva Villamón; Adela Cañete; Samuel Navarro; Amparo Ruiz; Carmen Melero; Antonio Herrero; Yania Yáñez; Rosa Noguera Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.405